【24h】

Reliability and validity of the BTE-Primus grip tool.

机译:BTE-Primus抓持工具的可靠性和有效性。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This study was designed to examine the reliability and validity of the newly designed grip tool of the Baltimore Therapeutic Equipment (BTE)-Primus and to investigate the effects of body position (sit versus stand), handedness, and fatigue on grip strength. The subjects performed maximal grip strength tests using the Jamar dynamometer and the BTE-Primus. Intraclass correlation coefficients were calculated for test-retest reliability and criterion-related validity. A repeated measures analysis of covariance was conducted to reveal differences in grip strength between instruments, body positions, hands, and sessions. The BTE-Primus grip tool was found to be reliable (r = 0.97 to 0.98) and valid (r = 0.95 to 0.96). There were no significant differences in grip strength scores between the Jamar and the BTE-Primus or between sitting and standing. Grip strength scores of the right hand were significantly greater than those of the left hand, and grip strength scores in the first session were significantly greater than those in the second session. The results of this study indicate that clinicians can use the BTE-Primus grip attachment at the second handle setting and know that is reliable, valid, and comparable to the second-handle setting of the Jamar dynamometer.
机译:这项研究旨在检查新设计的巴尔的摩治疗设备(BTE)-Primus握持工具的可靠性和有效性,并研究身体姿势(坐姿与站立姿势),惯性和疲劳对握力的影响。受试者使用Jamar测力计和BTE-Primus进行了最大握力测试。计算了类内相关系数以进行重测信度和与标准相关的有效性。进行了协方差的重复测量分析,以揭示器械,身体位置,手和部位之间握力的差异。发现BTE-Primus抓持工具可靠(r = 0.97至0.98)且有效(r = 0.95至0.96)。 Jamar和BTE-Primus之间或坐姿与站立姿势之间的握力强度得分无显着差异。右手的握力得分明显高于左手,第一节的握力得分明显高于第二节。这项研究的结果表明,临床医生可以在第二手柄设置下使用BTE-Primus握把附件,并且知道它是可靠,有效的,并且与Jamar测功机的第二手柄设置相当。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号