• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of hand therapy: Official journal of the American Society of Hand Therapists >Splinting and radial nerve palsy: a single-subject experiment.
【24h】

Splinting and radial nerve palsy: a single-subject experiment.

机译：夹板和radial神经麻痹：单项实验。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

This study examines which of three splint designs most effectively improved hand function in a patient with radial nerve palsy, and demonstrates the application of a single-subject experimental design. The static volar wrist cock-up splint (splint 1), dynamic tenodesis suspension splint (splint 2), and dorsal wrist cock-up with dynamic finger extension splint (splint 3) were evaluated. Each splint was worn for 3 weeks, and hand function was assessed by means of standardized measures of function and disability. Statistical significance was calculated using the minimal level of detectable change (MDC) at the 95% confidence level. Only with splints 2 and 3 did a true change in function occur, compared with baseline scores (no splint). In addition, the patient completed all tasks while using splints 2 and 3 but did not complete three tasks while using splint 1. The hand therapists' goal is to fabricate a splint that improves function and that the patient will wear. Only splint 3 met these criteria. This experiment highlights the need to evaluate both the statistical and the clinical significance of treatment interventions.
机译：这项研究检查了三种夹板设计中哪一种能最有效地改善radial神经麻痹患者的手功能，并证明了单受试者实验设计的应用。评估了静态手腕腕向上固定夹板（夹板1），动态腱固定悬吊夹板（夹板2）和带有动态手指延伸夹板的背侧腕固定板（夹板3）。每个夹板都佩戴了3周，并通过功能和残疾的标准化措施评估了手的功能。使用在95％置信水平下的最小可检测变化（MDC）计算统计显着性。与基线评分相比，只有夹板2和3才发生功能上的真正变化（无夹板）。另外，患者在使用夹板2和3时完成了所有任务，但在使用夹板1时未完成三个任务。护理师的目标是制造能够改善功能并可以穿戴的夹板。仅夹板3满足这些条件。该实验强调需要评估治疗干预措施的统计和临床意义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号