• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of long-term effects of medical implants >An endomechanical product evaluation and selection program by a healthcare resource management group purchasing organization.
【24h】

An endomechanical product evaluation and selection program by a healthcare resource management group purchasing organization.

机译：由医疗保健资源管理小组采购组织进行的机械内产品评估和选择计划。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The purpose of this report is to describe an endomechanical product evaluation and selection program in open surgical procedures as well as laparoscopic surgery designed by hospital representatives of Consorta, Inc. (Rolling Meadows, Illinois), a leading healthcare resource management and group purchasing organization, and Auto Suture/United States Surgical, (a division of Tyco Healthcare Group LP, Norwalk, Connecticut). In this evaluation program, twenty-three facilities of the six Consorta shareholder partners hospitals enrolled surgeons to participate in this nonexperimental observational study of the clinical performance of endomechanical products. Performance characteristics of the endomechanical products produced by Auto Suture that were evaluated in 1145 surgical procedures included clinically acceptable ratings, clinically not acceptable ratings, as well as superior ratings in 2988 product evaluations. In this endomechanical product evaluation, the surgeons found that the endomechanical products were clinically acceptable in 97.7% of the evaluations. In these endomechanical products that were judged to be clinically acceptable, the surgeons gave a superior rating to 20% of the products. It is important to emphasize that the clinically acceptable performance of laparoscopic products (98.1%) was very similar to that of endomechanical performance during open surgery (96.9%). Similarly, a superior rating of laparoscopic products that were judged to be clinically acceptable (22%) was comparable to that of the superior rating for endomechanical products that were considered to be clinically acceptable during open surgery (16%). The general surgeons who performed the majority (64.3%) of the product evaluations for the endomechanical products found an extremely high clinical acceptable rating in 98.2% of the evaluations. The obstetricians and gynecologists who performed the next highest number of procedures, 427 (14.3%), had a clinically acceptable rating of 97.0%. The lowest clinically acceptable rating (86.3%) for endomechanical products was reported by orthopedic surgeons who performed only 2.7% of the evaluations.
机译：本报告的目的是描述由领先的医疗保健资源管理和团购组织Consorta，Inc.（伊利诺伊州罗林梅多斯）的医院代表设计的开放式外科手术以及腹腔镜手术中的子宫内膜产品评估和选择计划，以及Auto Suture / United States Surgical（美国Tyco Healthcare Group LP的子公司，康涅狄格州诺沃克）。在此评估计划中，六个Consorta股东合作医院的23家机构招募了外科医生，以参加这项关于内机械产品临床性能的非实验性观察研究。由Auto Suture生产的子宫内机械产品的性能特征已在1145个外科手术程序中进行了评估，包括临床可接受的等级，临床不可接受的等级以及2988产品评估中的优异等级。在这种子宫内机械产品评估中，外科医生发现在97.7％的评估中，子宫内机械产品在临床上是可以接受的。在被认为是临床可接受的这些子宫内机械产品中，外科医生对产品的20％给予了较高的评价。需要强调的是，腹腔镜产品的临床可接受性能（98.1％）与开放手术期间的内机械性能非常相似（96.9％）。同样，被认为是临床上可接受的腹腔镜产品的优良评级（22％）与在开放手术期间被认为是临床上可接受的子宫内窥镜产品的优良评级（16％）相当。对内机械产品执行大部分产品评估的普通医生在98.2％的评估中发现了极高的临床可接受等级。进行次多手术的妇产科医生为427（14.3％），在临床上的接受率为97.0％。矫形外科医生报告称，对内机械产品的最低临床可接受评级（86.3％），仅进行了2.7％的评估。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号