...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of neurosurgical sciences >From Vesalius to tractography
【24h】

From Vesalius to tractography

机译：从维萨留斯到tractography

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The description of an anatomical specimen may look straightforward, but it appears that it depends in fact on several intermingled factors: technical methods for conservation, dissection and vascular injection and the anatomist skills are of course important. This is especially true when the studied organ, as for instance the brain, is subject to rapid putrefaction after death without any preservation technique. Nevertheless the possibility to reject, or at least criticize, the dominant paradigm is probably as important as these technical considerations: important changes occurred in brain representation between the early Middle Ages and the Early Modern Times, without major improvements of cadaveric preservation or dissection methods; Vesalius rejected the existence of the rete mirabile in human not only because he was a talented anatomist but also because he accepted and had the courage to fight the dominant tradition inherited from Galen. Such difficulties in the scientific approach obviously remain vivid, and should not be forgotten despite the development of modern tools for studying brain morphology and function.
机译：解剖标本的描述可能看起来很简单，但实际上似乎取决于几个因素：保存，解剖和血管注射的技术方法以及解剖学家的技能当然很重要。当被研究的器官（例如大脑）在死亡后没有任何保存技术的情况下迅速腐烂时，尤其如此。然而，拒绝或至少批评主导范式的可能性可能与这些技术考量同样重要：中世纪早期和近代早期之间的大脑表征发生了重要变化，而尸体保存或解剖方法没有重大改进;维萨留斯（Vesalius）拒绝了人类后遗症的存在，这不仅是因为他是一位才华横溢的解剖学家，还因为他接受并有勇气与加伦继承的主导传统作斗争。科学方法中的这些困难显然仍然很生动，尽管开发了研究大脑形态和功能的现代工具，也不应忘记这些困难。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号