...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of neurolinguistics >Time reference teased apart from tense: Thinking beyond the present
【24h】

Time reference teased apart from tense: Thinking beyond the present

机译:除了时态之外还嘲笑时间参考:超越当下的思考

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Reference to a time frame in which an event takes place can be done by verb inflection. If the time frame (past, present, future) is set by a temporal adverb, the verb inflection should correspond (yesterday he walk. ed; today he walk. s). Temporal violations by simple verbs (single, lexical verbs inflected with tense) in the present tense and with present time reference elicit a P600 effect (Baggio, 2008; Dragoy, Stowe, Bos, & Bastiaanse, 2012). However tense does not always coincide with time reference; in languages such as Dutch and English, reference to the past can be established by using the present tense in the present perfect (e.g. 'he has eaten the cake'). The current study investigates whether the P600 effects described by Dragoy et al. and Baggio are caused by tense or time reference violations of the verb. In the context of a past adverb, ERP responses to auxiliaries in present tense with either congruent past time reference or incongruent non-past time reference were compared. The findings show that the P600 effect for violations of the temporal context is caused by the time reference of the complete verb form, rather than by the tense.
机译:可以通过动词变位来引用发生事件的时间范围。如果时间范围(过去,现在,将来)是由时间副词设置的,则动词拐点应该相对应(昨天他走路,今天走路)。在当前时态下使用简单动词(以时态变化的单词,词法动词)对时间的违反会引起P600效应(Baggio,2008; Dragoy,Stowe,Bos和Bastiaanse,2012)。但是,时态并不总是与时间参考一致。在诸如荷兰语和英语之类的语言中,可以通过使用现在完成时的现在时态来建立对过去的参照(例如,“他吃了蛋糕”)。当前的研究调查了Dragoy等人描述的P600效应是否。和Baggio是由于该动词的时态或时间参考冲突引起的。在过去副词的上下文中,比较了当前时态与辅助过去时间参考或不一致非过去时间参考的ERP对辅助时态的响应。研究结果表明,违反时态上下文的P600效果是由完整动词形式的时间参考引起的,而不是由时态引起的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号