首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Neuroscience Methods >Improving the saccade peak velocity measurement for detecting fatigue.
【24h】

Improving the saccade peak velocity measurement for detecting fatigue.

机译:改进扫视峰值速度测量以检测疲劳。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The aim of the study was to compare saccadic peak velocity (SPV) values measured with video based Fitness Impairment Tester (FIT) and electro-oculography (EOG) during prolonged wakefulness. We tested different numbers of saccades and two saccade paradigms to improve the EOG measurements for detecting fatigue. The SPVs were measured from 11 fast patrol boat navigators with FIT and EOG every sixth hour until 54 h. Subjective sleepiness was assessed with the Karolinska Sleepiness Scale. EOG was measured using an overlap and a gap paradigm and the data was divided into sequential five 20-saccade blocks and cumulative blocks of 20, 40, 60, 80, and 100 saccades. Compared to the gap paradigm, the overlap paradigm produced a higher number of analyzable saccades for a given measurement time. The shorter measurements (20-40 saccades) appeared to be more sensitive for fatigue, whereas the longer measurements (60-100 saccades) were more sensitive to time spent on the task. Thus, the optimal number of saccades varies also depending on the research question. The EOG method was more sensitive to fatigue than FIT. The FIT values measured after 30 and 36 h of wakefulness did not differ significantly from the baseline values, while subjective sleepiness and the EOG values showed that the participants were significantly less alert at these time points. The EOG measurements can be improved for detecting fatigue by using the overlap saccade paradigm. The SPV values measured with the EOG method appear to be somewhat more sensitive in detecting fatigue than the FIT method.
机译:这项研究的目的是比较长时间醒着时使用基于视频的健身障碍测试仪(FIT)和眼电位仪(EOG)测得的声峰值速度(SPV)值。我们测试了不同数量的扫视镜和两个扫视镜范式,以改善EOG测量值以检测疲劳。每隔6个小时至54小时,从11具FIT和EOG的快速巡逻艇导航仪中测量SPV。用Karolinska嗜睡量表评估主观嗜睡。使用重叠和间隙范例测量EOG,并将数据分为连续的五个20扫视区块和20、40、60、80和100扫视的累积区块。与间隙范例相比,重叠范例在给定的测量时间内产生了更多数量的可分析扫视。较短的测量(20-40扫视)似乎对疲劳更敏感,而较长的测量(60-100扫视)对花费在任务上的时间更敏感。因此,最佳扫视次数也根据研究问题而变化。 EOG方法比FIT对疲劳更敏感。在清醒30和36小时后测得的FIT值与基线值没有显着差异,而主观嗜睡和EOG值表明参与者在这些时间点的警觉性明显降低。通过使用重叠扫视范式可以改善EOG测量以检测疲劳。用EOG方法测得的SPV值似乎比FIT方法更灵敏。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号