首页> 外文期刊>Journal of nursing and healthcare of chronic illness >Validation of two methods to evaluate adherence to oral anti-diabetic medication
【24h】

Validation of two methods to evaluate adherence to oral anti-diabetic medication

机译:两种评估口服抗糖尿病药物依从性的方法的验证

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Validation of two methods to evaluate adherence to oral anti-diabetic medication Aim. To validate two indirect methods to evaluate adherence to oral anti-diabetic therapy. Design. Convenience sample composed of 437 individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus. The Batalla test and the Measurement of Treatment Adherence were used to collect data in the participants' households. Pill count was considered the gold standard for assessing adherence to oral anti-diabetics. Data were collected in 2009. Findings. In relation to the gold standard, the Measurement of Treatment Adherence was more associated with non-adherence to oral anti-diabetics cases than the Batalla test (p - 0.000). The Measurement of Treatment Adherence displayed stronger correlation with pill count (p < 0.001) and was more exact than the Batalla test (0.646 > 0.561). Conclusion. The Measurement of Treatment Adherence was the best method to identify non-adherence to oral anti-diabetics of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Relevance to clinical practice. Identifying the best method to evaluate patients' adherence to oral anti-diabetic medication can facilitate the nurses' decision-making process in clinical practice.
机译:验证两种评估口服抗糖尿病药物依从性的方法的目的。验证两种间接评估口服抗糖尿病治疗依从性的方法。设计。便利性样本由437名2型糖尿病患者组成。使用Batalla测试和治疗依从性测量来收集参与者家中的数据。药丸计数被认为是评估对口服抗糖尿病药依从性的金标准。数据是在2009年收集的。就金标准而言,治疗依从性的测量与口服抗糖尿病药的不依从性的相关性要比Batalla检验高(p-0.000)。治疗依从性的测量显示与药丸计数的相关性更强(p <0.001),并且比Batalla检验的精确度更高(0.646> 0.561)。结论。测量治疗依从性是确定2型糖尿病患者对口服抗糖尿病药是否依从性的最佳方法。与临床实践有关。确定评估患者对口服抗糖尿病药物依从性的最佳方法可以促进护士在临床实践中的决策过程。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号