• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of occupational health psychology >Self-determination, control, and reactions to changes in workload: a work simulation.
【24h】

Self-determination, control, and reactions to changes in workload: a work simulation.

机译：自我决定，控制和对工作量变化的反应：工作模拟。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The objective of this experimental study is to capture the dynamic temporal processes that occur in changing work settings and to test how work control and individuals' motivational predispositions interact to predict reactions to these changes. To this aim, we examine the moderating effects of global self-determined and non-self-determined motivation, at different levels of work control, on participants' adaptation and stress reactivity to changes in workload during four trials of an inbox activity. Workload was increased or decreased at Trial 3, and adaptation to this change was examined via fluctuations in anxiety, coping, motivation, and performance. In support of the hypotheses, results revealed that, for non-self-determined individuals, low work control was stress-buffering and high work control was stress-exacerbating when predicting anxiety and intrinsic motivation. In contrast, for self-determined individuals, high work control facilitated the adaptive use of planning coping in response to a change in workload. Overall, this pattern of results demonstrates that, while high work control was anxiety-provoking and demotivating for non-self-determined individuals, self-determined individuals used high work control to implement an adaptive antecedent-focused emotion regulation strategy (i.e., planning coping) to meet situational demands. Other interactive effects of global motivation emerged on anxiety, active coping, and task performance. These results and their practical implications are discussed.
机译：这项实验研究的目的是捕捉变化的工作环境中发生的动态时间过程，并测试工作控制和个人的动机倾向如何相互作用以预测对这些变化的反应。为此，我们在四个收件箱试验中，研究了在不同的工作控制水平下，全局自我决定动机和非自我决定动机的调节作用对参与者的适应能力和压力反应性的影响。在试验3中增加或减少了工作量，并通过焦虑，应对，动机和绩效的波动来检验对这种变化的适应性。为支持这一假设，研究结果表明，对于非自我确定的个体，在预测焦虑和内在动机时，低工作控制是压力缓冲，而高工作控制则加剧了压力。相反，对于自定的个人，高工作控制有助于应对工作量的变化而适应性地使用计划应对方法。总体而言，这种结果模式表明，尽管高工作控制会激发非自决个体的焦虑并使其受挫，但自决个体仍会通过高工作控制来实施以适应性为前提的以情绪为导向的调节策略（即计划应对）以满足情况需求。全球动机的其他互动影响出现在焦虑，积极应对和任务执行上。讨论了这些结果及其实际意义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号