• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of occupational health psychology >Voluntary work and the relationship with unemployment, health, and well-being: A two-year follow-up study contrasting a materialistic and psychosocial pathway perspective
【24h】

Voluntary work and the relationship with unemployment, health, and well-being: A two-year follow-up study contrasting a materialistic and psychosocial pathway perspective

机译：志愿工作及其与失业，健康和福祉的关系：为期两年的后续研究，对比了唯物主义和社会心理途径的观点

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

In the present study we contrast materialistic (i.e., income and economic inequality) and psychosocial (i.e., social circumstances) pathway perspectives on whether volunteering while being unemployed mitigates the well-documented negative effects of unemployment on health, health behaviors, and well-being. We test our hypotheses using data from the 2010 and 2012 waves of the Swedish Longitudinal Occupational Study of Health (SLOSH; n = 717). This is a nationally representative, longitudinal, cohort survey. We compared groups of individuals who were (a) unemployed and volunteering during both SLOSH waves (n = 58), (b) unemployed and not volunteering during both SLOSH waves (n = 194), (c) employed and volunteering during both SLOSH waves (n = 139), and (d) employed and not volunteering during both SLOSH waves (n = 326). Conducting a path analysis in Mplus, we examined the interaction effects between labor market status (i.e., employed or unemployed) and voluntary work (i.e., volunteering or not) when predicting changes in health, health behaviors, and psychological well-being. Our results indicate that volunteering during unemployment significantly decreased the likelihood to smoke, the amount of cigarettes smoked, the likelihood of consuming alcohol, and the likelihood of being diagnosed with hypertension. These results support a psychosocial pathway perspective. For all other indicators no such buffering interaction effect was obtained, thereby supporting a materialistic pathway perspective. Nevertheless, for some indicators, volunteering was found to be beneficial for both the unemployed and employed. Consequently, integrating both perspectives might offer a better explanation for the onset of ill-health and ill-being.
机译：在本研究中，我们对比了唯物主义（即收入和经济不平等）和社会心理（即社会状况）途径的观点，即在失业时自愿参与是否减轻了失业对健康，健康行为和幸福的负面影响。我们使用2010年和2012年瑞典卫生纵向职业研究浪潮（SLOSH; n = 717）中的数据检验我们的假设。这是一项全国性的纵向队列研究。我们比较了（a）在两个SLOSH浪中（n = 58）失业和自愿的个人群体，（b）在两个SLOSH浪中（n = 194）的失业者和自愿者，（c）在两个SLOSH浪中的就业者和自愿者（n = 139），并且（d）在两次SLOSH浪潮中均被雇用且未自愿参加（n = 326）。在Mplus中进行路径分析时，我们在预测健康，健康行为和心理健康的变化时，研究了劳动力市场状况（即受雇或失业）与志愿工作（即是否自愿）之间的相互作用。我们的结果表明，失业期间的自愿参加活动显着降低了吸烟的可能性，吸烟量，饮酒的可能性以及被诊断为高血压的可能性。这些结果支持社会心理途径的观点。对于所有其他指标，均未获得这种缓冲相互作用的影响，从而支持了唯物主义的观点。但是，从某些指标来看，发现志愿服务对失业者和就业者都有利。因此，将两种观点融合在一起可能为疾病和不适的发作提供更好的解释。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号