首页> 外文期刊>Journal of orthopaedic nursing >The impact of different methods of wound closure and dressing on the rate of wound infection in patients with fracture of the neck of femur
【24h】

The impact of different methods of wound closure and dressing on the rate of wound infection in patients with fracture of the neck of femur

机译:不同闭合和包扎方法对股骨颈骨折患者伤口感染率的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

A prospective, pilot study was conducted to compare infection rates in four groups with different methods of wound closure and dressing among a convenience sample (n = 65) of patients with a fracture of the neck of femur. The four groups were:Clips with Mepore dressing (n = 25)Subcuticular suture with Mepore (n = 11)Clips with Opsite dressing (n = 16)Subcuticular suture with Opsite (n = 13)There were a total of 65 participants (5 males and 60 females) with ages ranging from 70 to 103 years (mean = 86, sd = 5.7). Patients were followed during their stay on the ward. The four groups were evaluated with respect to infection rates. Gross purulent discharge, dehiscence, or purulent discharge from a single suture was considered a wound infection and this was confirmed microbiologically. Infection was noted in 6/25 (24%) of cases in which clips were used with Mepore dressing as compared to 1/11 (9%) when subcuticular sutures and Mepore were used. Infection rates for clips and Opsite, and subcuticular and Opsite were 2/16 (12.5%) and zero, respectively.
机译:进行了一项前瞻性的前瞻性研究,以比较便利组(n = 65)股骨颈骨折患者中采用不同伤口闭合和包扎方法的四组感染率。这四组患者分别为:带有Mepore敷料的夹子(n = 25)带有Mepore的皮下缝合线(n = 11)带有相反的敷料的夹子(n = 16)有相反的皮下缝合的缝合(n = 13)共有65位参与者(5男性和60位女性),年龄介于70至103岁之间(平均= 86,标准差= 5.7)。在病房期间对患者进行随访。对四组进行了感染率评估。从单个缝合线产生的总脓性分泌物,裂开或脓性分泌物被认为是伤口感染,这在微生物学上得到了证实。在使用Mepore敷料的夹子中有6/25(24%)发生感染,而在使用表皮下缝线和Mepore的情况下则为1/11(9%)。夹子和对位以及皮下和对位的感染率分别为2/16(12.5%)和零。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号