...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of personality and social psychology >Are Adult Attachment Styles Categorical or Dimensional? A Taxometric Analysis of General and Relationship-Specific Attachment Orientations
【24h】

Are Adult Attachment Styles Categorical or Dimensional? A Taxometric Analysis of General and Relationship-Specific Attachment Orientations

机译：成人依恋类型是分类的还是尺寸的？一般和特定于关系的依恋倾向的分类法分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

One of the long-standing debates in the study of adult attachment is whether individual differences are best captured using categorical or continuous models. Although early research suggested that continuous models might be most appropriate, we revisit this issue here because (a) categorical models continue to be widely used in the empirical literature, (b) contemporary models of individual differences raise new questions about the structure of attachment, and (c) methods for addressing the types versus dimensions question have become more sophisticated over time. Analyses based on 2 samples indicate that individual differences appear more consistent with a dimensional rather than a categorical model. This was true with respect to general attachment representations and attachment in specific relationship contexts (e.g., attachment with parents and peers). These findings indicate that dimensional models of attachment style may be better suited for conceptualizing and measuring individual differences across multiple levels of analysis.
机译：在成人依恋研究中，长期存在的争论之一是，使用分类模型还是连续模型能否最好地捕捉个体差异。尽管早期的研究表明，连续模型可能是最合适的，但我们在此重新讨论此问题，因为（a）分类模型在经验文献中继续得到广泛使用;（b）个体差异的当代模型提出了关于依恋结构的新问题， （c）随着时间的流逝，解决类型与尺寸问题的方法变得越来越复杂。基于2个样本的分析表明，个体差异似乎更符合维度而非分类模型。对于一般的附件表示和特定关系上下文中的附件（例如与父母和同伴的附件）而言，这是正确的。这些发现表明，依恋风格的维度模型可能更适合概念化和衡量跨多个分析级别的个体差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号