...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of personnel psychology >Disentangling Task and Contextual Performance A Multitrait-Multimethod Approach
【24h】

Disentangling Task and Contextual Performance A Multitrait-Multimethod Approach

机译：解开任务和语境表现的多特征多方法方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

This study among 244 employees and their colleagues working in various sectors investigated the dimensionality of self-ratings and peer-ratings of task and contextual performance, using the scales of Goodman and Svyantek (1999). By applying the multitrait-multimethod approach, we examined the degree to which responses to performance items are influenced by the trait (task or contextual performance) and the method factors (self- or peer-ratings). Results of confirmatory factor analyses showed that while the two performance dimensions (i.e., traits) can be differentiated, responses to their items are influenced by the method factor. Specifically, peer-ratings explain more variance in task performance, while self-ratings explain more variance in contextual performance. Moreover, the measurement of task and contextual performance is invariant across self- and peer-ratings. Finally, the positive relationships between task and contextual performance on the one hand and work-related flow on the other hand are of equal strength. These findings support the validity of the performance measure but also highlight some impact of the method factors.
机译：这项针对244名员工和他们在各个部门工作的同事的研究使用Goodman和Svyantek（1999）的量表调查了任务和情境绩效的自我评估和同伴评估的维度。通过应用多特征-多方法方法，我们研究了对绩效项目的响应受特质（任务或上下文绩效）和方法因素（自我或同伴评估）影响的程度。验证性因素分析的结果表明，尽管可以区分两个绩效维度（即特质），但方法因素会影响其对项目的反应。具体来说，同伴评价说明任务绩效的更多差异，而自我评价则说明上下文绩效的更多差异。此外，任务和上下文绩效的度量在自评和对等评等中是不变的。最后，一方面任务和情境绩效之间的积极关系，另一方面与工作相关的流程之间的积极关系具有同等强度。这些发现支持了绩效评估的有效性，但也突出了方法因素的一些影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号