...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of public health >Are country reputations for good and bad leadership on AIDS deserved? An exploratory quantitative analysis.
【24h】

Are country reputations for good and bad leadership on AIDS deserved? An exploratory quantitative analysis.

机译:国家在艾滋病方面的领导地位的好与坏应该得到应有的重视吗?探索性定量分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Some countries (e.g. Brazil) have good reputations on AIDS policy, whereas others, (notably South Africa) have been criticized for inadequate leadership. Cross-country regression analysis reveals that these 'poster children' for AIDS leadership have indeed performed better or worse than expected given their economic and institutional constraints and the demographic and health challenges facing them. Regressions were run on HAART coverage (number on highly active antiretroviral therapy as percentage of total need) and MTCTP coverage (pregnant HIV+ women accessing mother-to-child-transmission prevention services as percentage of total need). Brazil, Cambodia, Thailand and Uganda (all of whom have established reputations for good leadership on AIDS performed consistently better than expected-as did Burkina-Faso, Suriname, Paraguay Costa Rica, Mali and Namibia. South Africa, which has the worst reputation for AIDS leadership, performed significantly below expectations-as did Uruguay and Trinidad and Tobago. The paper thus confirms much of the conventional wisdom on AIDS leadership at country level and suggests new areas for research.
机译:一些国家(例如巴西)在艾滋病政策方面享有盛誉,而其他国家(尤其是南非)因领导力不足而受到批评。跨国回归分析表明,鉴于他们的经济和体制限制以及他们面临的人口和健康挑战,这些领导艾滋病的“海报儿童”的表现确实好于或差于预期。对HAART覆盖率(高活性抗逆转录病毒疗法的数量占总需求的百分比)和MTCTP覆盖率(使用母婴传播预防服务的孕妇HIV +妇女占总需求的百分比)进行回归分析。巴西,柬埔寨,泰国和乌干达(在艾滋病方面的良好领导地位都建立了良好的声誉,其表现一直都比预期的好-布基纳法索,苏里南,巴拉圭哥斯达黎加,马里和纳米比亚)。与乌拉圭,特立尼达和多巴哥一样,艾滋病领导工作的表现也大大低于预期,从而证实了国家一级对艾滋病领导工作的许多传统看法,并提出了新的研究领域。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号