...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of psychoeducational assessment >Psychometric Assessment and Reporting Practices-Incongruence Between Theory and Practice
【24h】

Psychometric Assessment and Reporting Practices-Incongruence Between Theory and Practice

机译：心理测评和报告实践-理论与实践之间的不一致

获取原文
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The aim of the current study is twofold: (a) to investigate the rates at which researchers assess and report on the psychometric properties of the measures they use in their research and (b) to examine whether or not researchers appear to be generally employing sound/unsound rationales when it comes to how they conduct test evaluations. Based on a sample of 368 articles published in four journals in the year 2004, the findings suggest that, although evidence bearing on score precision/reliability and the internal structure of item responses remains under-reported, researchers appear to be assessing the relationships between test scores and external variables relatively more frequently than in the past. However, findings also indicate that, all told, very few researchers are assessing and reporting on internal score validity, and score precision/reliability, and external score validity, and in that sequence, suggesting that applied researchers may not always be adopting sound test-evaluative rationales in their psychometric assessments.
机译：本研究的目的是双重的：（a）调查研究人员评估和报告他们在研究中使用的措施的心理计量特性的比率，以及（b）检查研究人员是否似乎普遍采用声音关于他们如何进行测试评估的理由不充分。根据2004年在4种期刊上发表的368篇文章的样本，调查结果表明，尽管有关分数精确度/可靠性和项目回答内部结构的证据仍然少报，但研究人员似乎正在评估测试之间的关系。得分和外部变量的频率要比过去更高。但是，研究结果还表明，总体而言，很少有研究人员正在评估和报告内部分数的有效性，分数的准确性/可靠性和外部分数的有效性，并且按此顺序，这表明应用研究人员可能并不总是采用合理的测试，心理测评中的评估依据。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号