首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Rural Health >Uptake of free HPV vaccination among young women: a comparison of rural versus urban rates.
【24h】

Uptake of free HPV vaccination among young women: a comparison of rural versus urban rates.

机译:年轻妇女免费接受HPV疫苗接种:农村和城市比率的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

PURPOSE: To contrast rates of initial HPV vaccine uptake, offered at no cost, between a rural clinic, a rural community college, and an urban college clinic and to identify rural versus urban differences in uptake of free booster doses. METHODS: Young rural women attending rural clinics (n = 246), young women attending a rural community college (n = 251) and young women attending an urban university health clinic (n = 209) were recruited in Kentucky. After completing a brief questionnaire, women received a free voucher for HPV vaccination. Whether women redeemed the voucher for the initial dose of vaccine served as the study outcome variable. FINDINGS: In controlled analyses, the contrast in initial uptake between urban clinic women (reference category) and rural college women was significant (P[en space]< .0001). However, the contrast in initial uptake between urban clinic women (reference category) and rural clinic women was not significant (P[en space]= .42). The model predicting uptake of subsequent doses among those with initial uptake (n = 235) also indicated significant differences as a function of recruitment location, with rural clinic women being about 7 times more likely than urban clinic women (P[en space]< .0001) to not return for at least 1 follow-up dose. The contrast between urban clinic women and rural college women was also significant (P[en space]= .014). CONCLUSION: Initial uptake of free HPV vaccination among young rural college women may be problematic. Moreover, uptake of subsequent free doses among rural women may be problematic regardless of whether contact is made in a clinic or through college recruitment. Copyright 2011 National Rural Health Association.CAS Registry/EC Number/Name of Substance 0 (Papillomavirus Vaccines). 0 (human papillomavirus vaccine L1, type 6,11,16,18).
机译:目的:为了比较农村诊所,农村社区学院和城市学院诊所之间免费提供的最初HPV疫苗摄入率,并确定免费加强剂量的摄入量在农村地区与城市之间的差异。方法:在肯塔基州招募了农村妇女参加农村诊所(n = 246),农村妇女参加农村社区学院(n = 251)和城市大学医疗诊所(n = 209)。在完成简短的问卷调查后,妇女可获得免费的HPV疫苗接种券。女性是否兑换疫苗初始剂量的代金券作为研究结果变量。结果:在对照分析中,城市门诊女性(参考类别)和农村大学女性的初始摄取差异显着(P [en space] <.0001)。然而,城市诊所妇女(参考类别)和农村诊所妇女的初始摄取差异并不显着(P [en space] = .42)。该模型预测了初次摄入者(n = 235)中后续剂量的吸收,该模型还表明了招募地点的显着差异,农村诊所女性的可能性是城市诊所女性的7倍(P [en space] <。 0001)在至少1次随访剂量后不再返回。城市诊所女性和农村大学女性之间的对比也很显着(P [en space] = .014)。结论:农村年轻的大学女性最初免费接种HPV疫苗可能存在问题。此外,无论是在诊所进行接触还是通过大学招聘,农村妇女后续服用免费剂量都可能会造成问题。版权所有2011国家农村卫生协会。CAS注册号/ EC编号/物质名称0(乳头瘤病毒疫苗)。 0(人乳头瘤病毒疫苗L1,类型6,11,16,18)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号