...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Rural Studies >Envisioning upland futures: Stakeholder responses to scenarios for Europe's mountain landscapes
【24h】

Envisioning upland futures: Stakeholder responses to scenarios for Europe's mountain landscapes

机译：展望未来的高地：利益相关者对欧洲山区景观的反应

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

In a period of agricultural decline in the uplands of Europe, agriculture is ceasing to provide the primary rationale for the organisation, utilisation and functioning of rural space. Policy reform, market trends and changes to the way citizens and consumers think about the countryside all suggest a need for thinking strategically about the future development of these areas. However, without a broad involvement of stakeholders, land use conflicts, and social and cultural conflicts in general, may increase. Involving stakeholders in upland areas can be facilitated by using scenario technique and by discussing alternative futures in local stakeholder panels. In this paper we present four scenarios of land-use change for the year 2030, and their assessments by stakeholder panels in Scotland, France, Norway, Switzerland, Slovakia and Greece. The aim of the paper is to explore the ways in which stakeholders in these locations advocate and assess these scenarios. We also explore how stakeholders in different countries weight the visual landscape impacts, the livelihood and biodiversity aspects of the scenarios in their assessment, and the reasons for their prioritising. The cross-country analysis shows that stakeholders across the study areas are united in their overall rejection of agricultural liberalisation, advocating a production-oriented, but multifunctional and environmentally-friendly agriculture that maintains landscapes and biodiversity.
机译：在欧洲高地农业下降的时期，农业不再为农村空间的组织，利用和功能提供主要依据。政策改革，市场趋势以及公民和消费者对农村的看法方式的变化都表明需要对这些地区的未来发展进行战略性思考。但是，如果没有利益相关者的广泛参与，土地使用冲突以及一般的社会和文化冲突可能会增加。通过使用情景技术和在本地利益相关者小组中讨论替代性的未来，可以促进利益相关者在高地地区的参与。在本文中，我们提出了2030年土地利用变化的四种方案，并由苏格兰，法国，挪威，瑞士，斯洛伐克和希腊的利益相关者小组进行了评估。本文的目的是探讨这些地区的利益相关者倡导和评估这些方案的方式。我们还将探讨不同国家/地区的利益相关者如何在评估中权衡视觉景观影响，情景中的生计和生物多样性方面以及其优先次序的原因。跨国分析表明，研究领域的利益相关者团结一致，全面拒绝农业自由化，提倡以生产为导向，但又要保持景观和生物多样性的多功能，环境友好型农业。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号