...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Social Psychology >Intentionality Attributions About Perfect and Imperfect Duty Violations
【24h】

Intentionality Attributions About Perfect and Imperfect Duty Violations

机译：关于完美和不完全违反职责的故意归因

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Intentionality attributions were explored by drawing on the distinctionbetween perfect and imperfect moral duties. Previous research has shown that perfect dutyviolations carry greater attributional weight than imperfect duty violations (Trafimow &Trafimow, 1999; Trafimow, Bromgard, Finlay, & Ketelaar, 2005). In Studies 1 and 2, thedistinction between perfect and imperfect duties was replicated with intentionalityjudgments, and perfect duty violations received higher intentionality attributions thanimperfect duty violations. In Study 3 this effect was reversed by manipulating informationabout an agent's mental intentions or plans to perform a behavior. That is, participantsattributed less intentionality to perfect duty violations compared to imperfect duty viola-tions when a mental intention to perform the behavior was absent.
机译：通过完善和不完善的道德义务之间的区别来探索意图归因。先前的研究表明，与不完全的违反义务相比，完美的违反义务具有更大的归属感（Trafimow＆Trafimow，1999; Trafimow，Bromgard，Finlay和Ketelaar，2005）。在研究1和研究2中，完美和不完美职责之间的区分是通过故意判断来复制的，完美职责的违背行为得到的故意归因要比不完美职责的犯规更高。在研究3中，通过操纵有关特工的心理意图或行为计划的信息可以逆转这种影响。就是说，与缺乏不完善的违反行为的行为相比，参与者缺乏完美的违反行为的故意性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号