首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the American Pharmacists Association: JAPhA >Expert and consumer evaluation of patient medication leaflets provided in U.S. pharmacies.
【24h】

Expert and consumer evaluation of patient medication leaflets provided in U.S. pharmacies.

机译:美国药房提供的患者用药传单的专家和消费者评估。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the distribution and quality of patient medication leaflets provided in U.S. pharmacies. DESIGN: Observational. SETTING: United States. PARTICIPANTS: 384 randomly selected community pharmacies in 44 states. INTERVENTIONS: Professional shoppers (acting as patients) presented four new prescriptions to study pharmacies. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Medication leaflets obtained by shoppers were evaluated by expert and consumer raters using criteria specified in federal law mandating distribution of useful written information to 95% of individuals receiving new prescriptions by 2006. RESULTS: Leaflets were provided by pharmacies with 89% of 1,536 prescriptions presented by professional shoppers posing as patients. Leaflet quality varied: 95% of leaflets received high ratings on accuracy, but only 19% received high ratings on the specificity of directions. Fewer than 10% of all leaflets met quality criteria regarding contraindications, precautions, and how to avoid harm. One fourth of all leaflets had poor print size, according to the shoppers. CONCLUSION: Additional efforts are needed to meet federally mandated information distribution and quality goals by 2006.
机译:目的:评估美国药房提供的患者用药传单的分布和质量。设计:观察性的。地点:美国。参与者:在44个州中随机选择了384家社区药房。干预措施:专业的购物者(充当患者)提出了四种新处方来研究药房。主要观察指标:购物者获得的用药传单由专家和消费者评分者按照联邦法律规定的标准进行评估,规定到2006年必须向95%接受新处方药的个人分发有用的书面信息。由专业购物者冒充患者的1,536张处方。小叶质量各不相同:95%的小叶在准确性上获得了很高的评价,但只有19%的小叶在方向特异性上获得了高评价。只有不到10%的传单符合有关禁忌症,预防措施和避免伤害的质量标准。根据购物者的说法,所有传单中有四分之一的印刷尺寸较差。结论:需要做出额外的努力才能在2006年前实现联邦授权的信息分发和质量目标。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号