...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of women’s health >Differences between gynecologists and primary care physicians in hormone therapy prescribing: why they matter.
【24h】

Differences between gynecologists and primary care physicians in hormone therapy prescribing: why they matter.

机译:妇科医生和初级保健医生在荷尔蒙治疗处方上的区别:为什么重要。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In the 1990s, prescribing postmenopausal hormone therapy (HT) indefinitely for general health benefits-and not merely to treat vasomotor symptoms-became routine in many primary care and gynecology practices. Using observational and epidemiological studies as principal sources of supporting data, many authorities believed that the overall health benefits of HT outweighed the risks for most women, including those who were asymptomatic. In particular, HT was thought to reduce risk for cardiovascular disease (CVD). Clinicians were chided for ignoring the fact that CVD afflicted women as well as men and were encouraged to persuade women that long-term HT use was prudent. Prescribing HT for disease prevention became almost a badge of honor, showing that clinicians were serious about women's health.
机译:在1990年代,在许多初级保健和妇科实践中,为一般的健康益处无限期地开处方绝经后激素疗法(HT),而不仅仅是治疗血管舒缩症状。使用观察和流行病学研究作为支持数据的主要来源,许多主管部门认为,HT的总体健康益处超过了大多数妇女(包括无症状者)的风险。特别是,HT被认为可以降低心血管疾病(CVD)的风险。嘲笑临床医生无视CVD同时困扰着女性和男性的事实,并被鼓励说服女性长期使用HT是谨慎的做法。处方HT预防疾病几乎成了荣誉的标志,表明临床医生对妇女的健康非常重视。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号