...
【24h】

Comparison of computer-based and paper-based imagery strategies in learning anatomy.

机译:学习解剖学中基于计算机和基于纸张的图像策略的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This study evaluated the use of computer-based interactive imagery on students' achievement scores when compared with paper-based static imagery. It also assessed students' perceptions about the two imagery strategies and their different components. Sixty-four freshmen veterinary students (50 females, 14 males), enrolled in a comparative anatomy course, volunteered to participate in the study. This study used a pretest/posttest comparison group design and data was examined by analysis of covariance (ANCOVA). A close-ended questionnaire was administered to collect students' perceptions about the two imagery strategies. The mean difference in students' perceptions between the two strategies was analyzed using a two-tailed paired t-test. No significant differences were observed between computer-based interactive imagery and paper-based static imagery in the immediate recall of anatomical information. There was a significant difference in students' opinions toward the two strategies: students perceived computer-based interactive imagery as a better strategy in the assimilation of anatomical information than paper-based static imagery.
机译:与纸质静态图像相比,本研究评估了基于计算机的交互式图像对学生的成绩得分的使用。它还评估了学生对两种图像策略及其不同组成部分的看法。参加比较解剖学课程的64名新生兽医学生(50名女性,14名男性)自愿参加了这项研究。该研究采用了前测/后测比较组设计,并通过协方差分析(ANCOVA)检验了数据。进行了封闭式问卷调查,以收集学生对这两种图像策略的看法。使用两尾配对t检验分析了两种策略之间学生知觉的平均差异。在立即调用解剖信息时,基于计算机的交互式图像和基于纸张的静态图像之间没有观察到显着差异。学生对这两种策略的看法存在显着差异:学生认为基于计算机的交互式图像是比基于纸张的静态图像更好的同化解剖信息的策略。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号