• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Conservation Biology >A Comparison of Global Conservation Prioritization Models with Spatial Spending Patterns of Conservation Nongovernmental Organizations
【24h】

A Comparison of Global Conservation Prioritization Models with Spatial Spending Patterns of Conservation Nongovernmental Organizations

机译：保护非政府组织空间支出模式下的全球保护优先排序模式比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

In recent decades, various conservation organizations have developed models to prioritize locations for conservation. Through a survey of the spending patterns of 281 conservation nongovernmental organizations (NGOs), we examined the relation between 2 such models and spatial patterns of spending by conservation NGOs in 44 countries in sub-Saharan Africa. We tested whether, at the country level, the proportion of a country designated as a conservation priority was correlated with where NGOs spent money. For one model (the combination of Conservation International's hotspots and High Biodiversity Wilderness Areas, which are areas of high endemism with high or low levels of vegetation loss respectively), there was no relation between the proportion of a country designated as a priority and levels of NGO spending, including by the NGO associated with the model. In the second model (Global 200), the proportion of a country designated as a priority and the amount of money spent by NGOs were significantly and positively related. Less money was spent in countries in northern and western sub-Saharan Africa than countries in southern and eastern Africa, relative to the proportion of the country designated as a conservation priority. We suggest that on the basis of our results some NGOs consider increasing their spending on the areas designated as of conservation priority which are currently relatively underfunded, although there are economic, political, cultural, historical, biological, and practical reasons why current spending patterns may not align with priority sites.
机译：在最近的几十年中，各种保护组织已经开发出了优先考虑保护位置的模型。通过对281个保护非政府组织（NGOs）的支出模式进行的调查，我们研究了2种此类模式与撒哈拉以南非洲44个国家的保护NGO的支出空间模式之间的关系。我们测试了在国家一级指定为保护重点的国家的比例是否与非政府组织花钱的地方相关。对于一种模式（国际自然保护区的热点和高生物多样性荒野地区的结合，这两个地区分别是高流行度，植被丧失水平高或低的区域），被指定为优先重点的国家所占比例与NGO支出，包括与模型相关的NGO支出。在第二种模式（全球200强）中，被指定为优先事项的国家所占比例与非政府组织的支出金额之间存在显着的正相关关系。相对于被指定为保护重点的国家比例，撒哈拉以南非洲北部和西部国家的支出比南部非洲和东部非洲少。我们建议，根据我们的结果，一些非政府组织考虑增加在指定为优先保护领域的支出，这些领域目前资金不足，尽管目前的支出方式可能有经济，政治，文化，历史，生物学和实际的原因与优先网站不符。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号