• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Conservation Biology >Designing systematic conservation assessments that promote effective implementation: Best practice from South Africa
【24h】

Designing systematic conservation assessments that promote effective implementation: Best practice from South Africa

机译：设计系统的保护评估以促进有效实施：南非的最佳实践

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Systematic conservation assessment and conservation planning are two distinct fields of conservation science often confused as one and the same. Systematic conservation assessment is the technical, often computer-based, identification of priority areas for conservation. Conservation planning is composed of a systematic conservation assessment coupled with processes for development of an implementation strategy and stakeholder collaboration. The peer-reviewed conservation biology literature abounds with studies analyzing the performance of assessments (e.g., area-selection techniques). This information alone, however, can never deliver effective conservation action; it informs conservation planning. Examples of how to translate systematic assessment outputs into knowledge and then use them for "doing" conservation are rare. South Africa has received generous international and domestic funding for regional conservation planning since the mid-1990s. We reviewed eight South African conservation planning processes and identified key ingredients of best practice for undertaking systematic conservation assessments in a way that facilitates implementing conservation action. These key ingredients include the design of conservation planning processes, skills for conservation assessment teams, collaboration with stakeholders, and interpretation and mainstreaming of products (e.g., maps) for stakeholders. Social learning institutions are critical to the successful operationalization of assessments within broader conservation planning processes and should include not only conservation planners but also diverse interest groups, including rural landowners, politicians, and government employees.
机译：系统的保护评估和保护规划是保护科学的两个截然不同的领域，通常将它们混淆为一。系统的保护评估是对技术的优先领域的识别，通常是基于计算机的。保护规划包括系统的保护评估以及制定实施策略和利益相关方合作的过程。经过同行评审的保护生物学文献很多，其中包括分析评估绩效的研究（例如区域选择技术）。但是，仅靠这些信息永远无法提供有效的保护行动。它告知保护计划。如何将系统的评估结果转化为知识，然后将其用于“保护”的例子很少。自1990年代中期以来，南非已为区域保护规划获得了大量国际和国内资金。我们审查了南非的八个养护规划流程，并确定了进行系统养护评估的最佳做法的关键要素，从而促进了实施养护行动。这些关键要素包括保护规划流程的设计，保护评估小组的技能，与利益相关者的合作以及利益相关者对产品（例如地图）的解释和主流化。社会学习机构对于在更广泛的保护规划流程中成功实施评估至关重要，并且不仅应包括保护规划人员，还应包括包括农村土地所有者，政客和政府雇员在内的各种利益集团。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号