• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Nature reviews Cancer >Contested American hegemony and regional order in postwar Asia: the case of Southeast Asia Treaty Organization
【24h】

Contested American hegemony and regional order in postwar Asia: the case of Southeast Asia Treaty Organization

机译：亚洲战后的美国霸权和区域秩序：东南亚条约组织的案例

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Why did American-led postwar institution building lead to different types of security orders in Asia and Europe? The article investigates the failure of the Southeast Asia Treaty Organization (SEATO)-the only postwar multilateral security organization in the Asia-Pacific region that resembled NATO-as contrasted with NATO's survival. Despite the popular notion of 'American liberal hegemony', the US-led multilateral security institution in fact faced serious resistance in Southeast Asia during the early years of the Cold War, as regional players viewed SEATO as yet another form of Western imperialism threatening their independence. The article makes a theoretical argument for the role of delegitimation in hegemonic order formation and shows that the Asian historical experience of Western colonialism had structural consequences for American-led hegemonic order building in Asia. China-India joint delegitimation strategies against the United States invoked local actors' collective beliefs against colonialism portraying SEATO as a vehicle of Western domination. Once established, the United States' European allies within SEATO placed constraints on the exercise of American hegemonic power, by taking advantage of the multilateral rules of SEATO and refusing to act collectively in the local crises in Laos. Archival evidence suggests that such delegitimation and restraint strategies were fairly successful in terms of limiting SEATO membership and blocking interventions in Indochina, strengthening Asian neutrality rather than creating a pro-US bloc in the region.
机译：为什么美国领导的邮舰机构建设导致亚洲和欧洲的不同类型的安全订单？本文调查了东南亚条约组织（SEASO）的失败 - 亚太地区唯一的北非的多边安全组织 - 与北约的生存形成鲜明对比。尽管受到“美国自由主义霸权”的民众概念，但美国领导的多边安全机构实际上在冷战期间在东南亚面临严重的抵抗力，因为区域参与者认为席位是另一种形式的西方帝国主义威胁着他们的独立性。该文章对履历阶级秩序的作用作出了理论论点，并表明西殖民主义的亚洲历史经验对亚洲的美国LED霸权秩序建设具有结构性后果。中国 - 印度联合德格尼亚策略对美国援引当地的行动者对殖民主义的集体信念，描绘了席位的殖民主义作为西方统治的载体。曾经成立，美国的欧洲盟国盟国盟国在席位局局势上放大了美国霸权权力的制约，通过利用多边席帽的多边规则，拒绝在老挝当地危机中集体行动。档案证据表明，在限制席位会员和阻止在印度支那，加强亚洲中立性而不是在该地区创建前美国集团，这些宗派和克制策略相当成功。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号