...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Current Science: A Fortnightly Journal of Research >Publications versus research: promotion of science or self
【24h】

Publications versus research: promotion of science or self

机译：出版物与研究：促进科学或自我

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The University Grants Commission (UGC), New Delhi is charged with the responsibility of developing certain guidelines for appointments and promotions of teachers in universities and colleges to maintain academic norms. A recent rule introduces a point system based on faculty research publications. Publication in an ‘indexed journal’ would carry 5–10 points, whereas papers in journals with impact factor above 2 would carry 15 points. This will encourage publication of incomplete and rather partial accounts of research in order to gain maximum points in the university and college system. A truly full length and high quality study will take some time to get published in a journal of high repute, compared to a large number of publications in ordinary journals. In the current context of assessment for promotion, numbers will help acquire more points. The present scheme of points by UGC is likely to promote some sort of misuse and abuse of the system of scientific publication.
机译：新德里的大学教育资助委员会（UGC）负责制定某些准则，以任命和晋升大学和学院的教师以保持学术规范。最近的规则引入了基于教师研究出版物的积分系统。在“索引期刊”上发表的论文将获得5-10分，而在影响因子大于2的期刊上发表的论文将获得15分。这将鼓励发表不完整和相当部分的研究报告，以便在大学和学院系统中获得最大的积分。与普通期刊上的大量出版物相比，真正高质量和高质量的研究将需要一些时间才能在高声誉的期刊上发表。在目前的晋升评估背景下，数字将有助于获得更多积分。教资会现行的学分分配办法可能会促进某种形式的科学出版系统的滥用和滥用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号