首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Applied Polymer Science >Comparative analysis of atrazine molecularly imprinted polymers using acetonitrile and toluene as solvents
【24h】

Comparative analysis of atrazine molecularly imprinted polymers using acetonitrile and toluene as solvents

机译:乙腈和甲苯作为溶剂的阿特拉嗪分子印迹聚合物的比较分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Acetonitrile and toluene are solvents commonly used for the synthesis of atrazine molecularly imprinted polymers (MIPs), but their effects have seldom been compared in the same imprinting system. In this paper, effects of the two solvents in an atrazine molecular imprinting system were evaluated theoretically and experimentally. A polarizable continuum model was adopted, and it was found that using the two solvents, the energy difference for the atrazine-methacrylic acid complex between vacuum and solution was not the same. The two types of MIPs prepared using different solvents vary in morphology, porosity, binding capacity, and specificity. All of these results suggest that the abilities of the solvents used to form hydrogen bonds with other compounds in the system are different. The porogen imprinting effect of the solvents also has an influence on binding capacity. Compared to MIPs synthesized using acetonitrile as solvent (MIPs-ACN), MIPs synthesized using toluene as solvent (MIPs-PhMe) have fewer but larger pores and exhibit much higher adsorption capability but less rigorous specificity. (c) 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
机译:乙腈和甲苯是常用于合成阿特拉津的分子印迹聚合物(MIPS)的溶剂,但在相同的压印系统中,它们的效果很少。在本文中,理论上和实验评估了亚唑嗪分子印迹系统中的两种溶剂的效果。采用可极化的连续体模型,发现使用两种溶剂,真空和溶液之间的阿特拉嗪 - 甲基丙烯酸复合物的能量差异不一样。使用不同溶剂制备的两种类型的MIP在形态,孔隙率,结合能力和特异性方面变化。所有这些结果表明,用于形成氢键与系统中的其他化合物形成氢键的能力是不同的。溶剂的致孔剂印迹效果也对结合能力产生影响。与使用乙腈合成的MIPS相比,使用乙腈(MIPS-ACN),使用甲苯作为溶剂(MIPS-PHME)合成的MIPS具有较少但更大的孔隙,并且具有更高的吸附能力但具有更严重的特异性。 (c)2018 Wiley期刊,Inc。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号