首页> 外文期刊>Crops >War on weeds
【24h】

War on weeds

机译:杂草战争

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

HGCA-funded research is looking for better ways to tackle blackgrass in minimum cultivation systems. You stand to lose 1 pound/ha if you leave just one blackgrass head/sq m in your wheat. With that in mind it's not surprising many growers won't swapploughing for cheaper methods of cultivation. Good ploughing helps control blackgrass by burying seed deep enough to prevent emergence. But it comes at a cost. A typical plough-based system costs 85-120 pound/ha, while minimum cultivations could be 50 pound/ha less. The trouble is shallow, non-inversion tillage doesn't bury blackgrass seeds, leaving growers dependant on a high level of control pre-drilling, says ADAS Boxworth's Dr Sarah Cook. But there could be ways of reducing the blackgrass burden under minimum cultivations to allow major fixed cost savings, she suggests.
机译:HGCA资助的研究正在寻找在最小栽培系统中解决黑草的更好方法。如果您仅在小麦中留下一个黑草头/平方米,则您将损失1磅/公顷。考虑到这一点,不足为奇的是,许多种植者不会将耕地换成便宜的耕种方法。良好的耕作方式可以将种子埋得足够深以防止出苗,从而有助于控制黑草。但这是有代价的。一个典型的耕作系统的成本为85-120磅/公顷,而最少的耕种可以减少50磅/公顷。 ADAS Boxworth的莎拉·库克(Sarah Cook)博士说,问题很浅,非反转耕作不会掩埋黑草种子,使种植者不得不依赖高水平的预钻控制。她说,但是有一些方法可以减少最低限度种植下的黑草负担,从而节省大量的固定成本。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号