...
首页> 外文期刊>Academic radiology >MDCT for computerized volumetry of pneumothoraces in pediatric patients.
【24h】

MDCT for computerized volumetry of pneumothoraces in pediatric patients.

机译:MDCT用于儿科患者气胸的计算机化容量测定。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: Our purpose in this study was to develop an automated computer-aided volumetry (CAV) scheme for quantifying pneumothorax in multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) images for pediatric patients and to investigate the imaging parameters that may affect its accuracy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty-eight consecutive pediatric patients (mean age 12 +/- 6 years) with pneumothorax who underwent MDCT for evaluation were collected retrospectively for this study. All cases were imaged by a 16- or 64-MDCT scanner with weight-based kilovoltage, low-dose tube current, 1.0-1.5 pitch, 0.6-5.0 mm slice thickness, and a B70f (sharp) or B31f (soft) reconstruction kernel. Sixty-three pneumothoraces >/=1 mL were visually identified in the left (n = 30) and right (n = 33) lungs. Each identified pneumothorax was contoured manually on an Amira workstation V4.1.1 (Mercury Computer Systems, Chelmsford, MA) by two radiologists in consensus. The computerized volumes of the pneumothoraces were determined by application of our CAV scheme. The accuracy of our automated CAV scheme was evaluated by comparison between computerized volumetry and manual volumetry, for the total volume of pneumothoraces in the left and right lungs. RESULTS: The mean difference between the computerized volumetry and the manual volumetry for all 63 pneumothoraces >/=1 mL was 8.2%. For pneumothoraces >/=10 mL, >/=50 mL, and >/=200 mL, the mean differences were 7.7% (n = 57), 7.3% (n = 33), and 6.4% (n = 13), respectively. The correlation coefficient was 0.99 between the computerized volume and the manual volume of pneumothoraces. Bland-Altman analysis showed that computerized volumetry has a mean difference of -5.1% compared to manual volumetry. For all pneumothoraces >/=10 mL, the mean differences for slice thickness
机译:理由和目的:我们在这项研究中的目的是开发一种自动计算机辅助容积计(CAV)方案,以量化多发性儿童X线断层摄影(MDCT)图像中的气胸,并研究可能影响其准确性的成像参数。材料与方法:本研究回顾性收集了接受MDCT评估的58例连续性气胸儿科患者(平均年龄12 +/- 6岁)。所有病例均通过16或64-MDCT扫描仪成像,并具有基于重量的千伏电压,低剂量管电流,1.0-1.5螺距,0.6-5.0 mm切片厚度以及B70f(清晰)或B31f(软)重建内核。在左(n = 30)和右(n = 33)肺中目视鉴定出63个≥/ = 1 mL的气胸。两位放射科医生一致同意,在Amira工作站V4.1.1(Mercury Computer Systems,Chelmsford,MA)上手动对每个识别出的气胸进行轮廓处理。气胸的计算机化量是通过应用我们的CAV方案确定的。通过比较计算机化的容积式和手动容积式的左肺和右肺中的气胸总量,我们评估了自动CAV方案的准确性。结果:63例> / = 1 mL的所有63气胸患者的计算机量器与手动量器之间的平均差为8.2%。对于> / = 10 mL,> / = 50 mL和> / = 200 mL的气胸,平均差异为7.7%(n = 57),7.3%(n = 33)和6.4%(n = 13),分别。气胸的计算机体积和人工体积之间的相关系数为0.99。 Bland-Altman分析显示,计算机化的量表与手动量表相比平均差异为-5.1%。对于所有> / = 10 mL的气胸,切片厚度

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号