...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Bariatric Surgical Patient Care >First 30 Robotic Versus Last 30 Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy
【24h】

First 30 Robotic Versus Last 30 Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy

机译：前30个机器人与最后30个腹腔镜套管胃切除术

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Background: Robotic sleeve gastrectomy (RSG) is a new and popular option for obesity surgery. This study aims to analyze our experience during the transition period from laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) to RSG. Patients and Methods: Sixty patients with sleeve gastrectomy (SG) were enrolled into the study. Last 30 patients in the LSG group and first 30 patients in the RSG group were included in the study. Total operative time (OT), docking time, complications (intraoperative and postoperative), hospital stay, and amount of postoperative drainage were recorded and groups were compared. Results: There were no complications during surgery. There was no mortality or conversions to another approach in any patient. There were no leaks. Hospital stay, complication rates, and excess weight loss rates were similar in both groups. OT was longer in the RSG group. Postoperative drainage was lesser in the RSG group. Conclusion: RSG is safe and feasible and might be considered as an initial procedure for surgeons who plan to move forward to more complex procedures in bariatric surgery. For an experienced surgeon, the learning curve seems shorter for this procedure.
机译：背景：机器人套管胃切除术（RSG）是肥胖手术的一种新的和流行的选择。本研究旨在将我们的经验分析到从腹腔镜套管胃切除术（LSG）到RSG的过渡期。患者和方法：六十六患者患有研究胃切除术（SG）。 LSG集团的最后30名患者和RSG组的前30名患者纳入该研究。记录了总操作时间（OT），对接时间，并发症（术中和术后），检查和术后排水量，并进行了组。结果：手术过程中没有任何并发​​症。任何患者都没有死亡或转换到另一种方法。没有泄漏。两组，医院住宿，并发症率和超重损失率多相似。 rsg集团的OT更长。术后排水在RSG组中较小。结论：RSG是安全可行的，可能被视为外科医生的初始程序，他们计划在肥胖症手术中提升到更复杂的程序。对于经验丰富的外科医生，学习曲线似乎较短。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号