首页> 外文期刊>Cornea >An Analysis of YouTube Videos as Educational Resources for Patients About Refractive Surgery
【24h】

An Analysis of YouTube Videos as Educational Resources for Patients About Refractive Surgery

机译:屈光外科患者YOUTUBE视频作为教育资源分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose: The aim of the study was to assess the quality of videos on YouTube as educational resources about refractive surgery. Methods: This is a retrospective, cross-sectional, register-based study. A search of YouTube was performed for the term "refractive surgery" without any changes to the Web site's standard search preferences. The first 160 videos were recorded. Additional videos from the search engine were also searched for the other common terms "LASIK," "PRK," and "laser eye surgery." The first 50 videos for each additional term were evaluated. A total of 310 videos were evaluated regarding DISCERN score (min-max: 16-75), Journal of the American Medical Association score (min-max: 0-4), and Global Quality score (min-max: 0-5). Results: Once 135 videos that did not meet the inclusion criteria were excluded from the sample, the remaining 175 videos were analyzed. The mean DISCERN, Journal of the American Medical Association, and Global Quality scores were 33.25 +/- 15.34 (poor quality), 0.74 +/- 0.82 (lowest quality), and 1.74 +/- 0.81 (poor quality), respectively. Of the 175 videos, 77 (42%) had been uploaded by physicians, 67 (38.2%) by health channels, 16 (9.1%) by patients, and another 15 (8.5%) by medical organizations. Conclusions: Although some of the analyzed online videos contain beneficial information, YouTube videos do not generally seem to be useful as educational resources for patients about refractive surgery. Nevertheless, health care professionals should continue to assess the reliability and usefulness of medical information provided by online resources from the viewpoint of patients.
机译:目的:该研究的目的是评估YouTube上的视频质量作为关于屈光手术的教育资源。方法:这是一种回顾性,横截面,基于寄存器的研究。对YouTube的搜索是对术语“屈光手术”进行的,而没有对网站的标准搜索首选项的任何更改。记录了前160个视频。来自搜索引擎的其他视频也被搜索了其他常见术语“LASIK,”PRK,“和”激光眼科手术“。评估每个附加术语的前50个视频。关于辨别得分(MIN-MAX:16-75),共同评估了310个视频,“美国医学协会得分”(MIN-MAX:0-4)和全球质量分数(MIN-MAX:0-5) 。结果:一旦不符合包含标准的135个视频被排除在样本之外,剩下的175个视频被分析。 “美国医学协会”和“全球质量评分”和“质量差”,0.74 +/- 0.82(质量最低)和1.74 +/- 0.81(质量差)分别为33.25 +/-15.34(质量差)。在175个视频中,77名(42%)由医生,67(38.2%)上传,患者16(38.2%),患者16(9.1%),另外15名(8.5%)由医疗组织。结论:虽然一些分析的在线视频包含有益信息,但YouTube视频通常似乎对屈光手术的教育资源不错。尽管如此,医疗保健专业人员应继续评估在患者的角度的在线资源提供的医疗信息的可靠性和有用性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号