• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Advanced Science Letters >A Comparative Study on the Effect of Virtual Field Trips (VFTs) Through Video Aided Learning (VAL) and Traditional Learning Approaches on Students Knowledge Acquisition
【24h】

A Comparative Study on the Effect of Virtual Field Trips (VFTs) Through Video Aided Learning (VAL) and Traditional Learning Approaches on Students Knowledge Acquisition

机译：虚拟实地考察（VFTS）对学生知识获取的视频辅助学习（VAL）和传统学习方法的对比研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

A field trip is a group of people journey to a place away from their normal environment usually for observation to provide students with experiences outside their everyday activities. In highway engineering course, it would be an ideal if students could be taken on a tour all aroundthe Malaysia to witness directly how they can apply the theory and obtained experiences starting from asphalt mixture production at quarry until the construction and maintenance activities at site. Unfortunately, it would clearly be impossible to take a group of 100–300 students on suchtrips, because of cost, scheduling and logistic limitations. Therefore, the main objective of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of virtual field trips (VFTs) through video aided learning (VAL) as compared to a conventional approach on students’ knowledge acquisition. This studystarts by developing the VAL based on syllabus which covers concepts, principles, procedures, practical and processes of construction activities at sites. Experimental research with control group (Video Aided Learning-VAL vs. Traditional-TRA) and post-tests only was implemented. There were117 participants of civil engineering undergraduate students, attending the Highway Engineering (BFC 32302) module. Participants completed a post-test of multiple choice questions, of all thee syllabus and attended an interview session after 14 weeks of treatment. The result indicated thatboth methods contributed similarly on students’ knowledge acquisition. In this context of study, it can be concluded that either VAL or TRA approach does not favor of students’ knowledge acquisition. Future research should deeply investigate transfer of knowledge into specificdetails. However, an interview indicated that VAL was more encouraging learning than that of TRA approach.
机译：野外旅行是一群人，远离正常环境的地方，通常用于观察，为学生提供日常活动之外的经验。在公路工程课程中，如果可以在马来西亚围绕马来西亚围绕着学生可以直接寻求他们如何应用该理论并获得从采石场中的沥青混合生产的经验，直到现场的建筑和维护活动。不幸的是，由于成本，调度和后勤限制，这将清楚地区采取一组100-300名学生。因此，与学生知识获取的传统方法相比，本研究的主要目的是通过视频辅助学习（VAL）来评估虚拟实地考察（VFT）的有效性。本研究开始根据教学大纲开发Val，涵盖位于地点的概念，原则，程序，实际和工艺的概念，原则，程序，实际和过程。对照组的实验研究（视频辅助学习 - Val与传统 - TRA）和测试后的实验研究。有117名土木工程本科学生参与者，参加公路工程（BFC 32302）模块。参与者完成了多个选择问题的后检验，所有的教学大纲，并在治疗后14周后参加了访谈会议。结果表明，在学生的知识收购时，禁止方法贡献了。在这种研究的背景下，可以得出结论，Val或TRA方法不赞成学生的知识收购。未来的研究应该深入调查知识的转移到特定的税前。然而，面试表明VAL比TRA方法更令人鼓舞。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号