首页> 外文期刊>American journal on intellectual and developmental disabilities: AJIDD >Task and Participant Variables Predict Communication Complexity Scale (CCS) Scores: Closer Examination of the CCS
【24h】

Task and Participant Variables Predict Communication Complexity Scale (CCS) Scores: Closer Examination of the CCS

机译:任务和参与者变量预测通信复杂性比例(CCS)分数:仔细检查CCS

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Communication Complexity Scale (CCS) scores for 269 minimally verbal participants were examined to determine if communicator behavior and task and communicator characteristics were related to scores in a manner consistent with theoretical and research evidence expectations. Each participant completed an interactive assessment with 6 joint attention tasks and 6 behavior regulation tasks. Caregivers completed the Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales II. Results indicated (a) joint attention tasks yielded lower scores than behavior regulation tasks, (b) older participants had lower scores, (c) individuals with autism spectrum disorder scored more similarly than those without, (d) the difference between joint attention and behavior regulation scores was greater for the autism spectrum disorder group, and (e) adaptive behavior was significantly positively related to complexity scores.
机译:审查了269名MimeLy言语参与者的通信复杂性规模(CCS)分数被检查以确定通信者行为和任务和通信者特征是否以与理论和研究证据预期一致的方式与分数相关。 每个参与者完成了6个联合注意任务和6个行为规则任务的交互式评估。 护理人员完成了Vineland自适应行为秤II。 结果(a)联合注意力任务的分数低于行为规则任务,(b)旧的参与者的分数较低,(c)患有自闭症谱系障碍的个体比没有,(d)联合关注和行为之间的差异更加相似 自闭症谱系障碍组的调节分数更大,(e)适应性与复杂性分数显着正相关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号