...
首页> 外文期刊>Aviation, space, and environmental medicine. >[095] THE EVIDENCE: MATCHED CASE-CONTROL STUDY (CAR VERSUS NON-CAR)
【24h】

[095] THE EVIDENCE: MATCHED CASE-CONTROL STUDY (CAR VERSUS NON-CAR)

机译:[095]证据:匹配案例对照研究(汽车与非汽车)

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

INTRODUCTION: Restricting cabin altitude below 8,000 ft is prescribed to counter altitude-induced stressors during aeromedical evacuation. However, conventional wisdom has cabin altitude restrictions (CARs) adding to mission time and fuel expense. METHODS: A retrospective review of 100 patients was conducted. Fifty CAR patients were randomly selected from 2007-2013 and matched, using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision codes and, to some extent, aircraft, with 50 non-CAR patients. Patient data were taken from four different databases and merged to create a unique dataset for analysis. Patient demographics, inflight status, inflight incident reports, overall outcomes, and mission costs were investigated.
机译:简介:限制驾驶室高度低于8,000英尺,以在航空医学疏散期间对抗高度诱导的压力。 然而,传统智慧有机舱高度限制(汽车)增加了任务时间和燃油费用。 方法:进行100名患者的回顾性审查。 五十辆车患者从2007 - 2013年随机选择,并使用国际疾病分类,第九次修订代码和一定程度的飞机,有50名非汽车患者。 患者数据从四个不同的数据库中获取并合并以创建唯一数据集进行分析。 调查了患者人口统计学,机会地位,机动事件报告,整体结果和使命成本。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号