Reflections on and suggestions for reporting vulnerability research: How can peer reviewed articles reflect complex practice in low consensus fields such that they better support review and synthesis?

Tamas Peter A.; Delaney Aogan; Crane Todd; Hengeveld Geerten M.

首页> 外文期刊>Environmental science & policy >Reflections on and suggestions for reporting vulnerability research: How can peer reviewed articles reflect complex practice in low consensus fields such that they better support review and synthesis?

【24h】

Reflections on and suggestions for reporting vulnerability research: How can peer reviewed articles reflect complex practice in low consensus fields such that they better support review and synthesis?

机译：报告漏洞研究的思考与建议：同行评审文章如何在低共识领域反映复杂的实践，以便更好地支持审查和综合？

获取原文

获取原文并翻译 | 示例

掌桥外文数据库（机构版） >>

开具论文收录证明 >>

文献代查 >>

页面导航

摘要
著录项
相似文献
相关主题

摘要

As the international community increases investment in agricultural adaptation to climate change in low and middle-income countries (LMICs), there is increasing demand to extract generalized knowledge claims about vulnerability from individual studies. If synthesis is to successfully produce sound generalized knowledge claims, relevant evidence must be possible to find and interpret. The format through which research in this field is now normally reported does not adequately support finding relevant evidence nor its interpretation. This opinion piece outlines and assesses three possible pathways for changing reporting practices in vulnerability research - standardization of methods, reporting checklists, and modularised reporting - in order to support the identification and synthesis of evidence. Rather than resolving these issues, this piece intends to open up the conversation about them.

机译：由于国际社会增加了对低收入和中等收入国家的气候变化（LMIC）对农业适应气候变化的投资时，增加了提取各种研究脆弱性的广义知识声明的需求。如果合成成功地产生声音广义知识声明，则必须可以找到和解释相关证据。现在通常报告该领域的研究的格式不会充分支持找到相关证据，也没有其解释。这种意见片概述并评估了在漏洞研究中改变报告实践的三种可能的途径 - 方法的标准化，报告清单和模块化报告 - 以支持证据的识别和综合。这件作品而不是解决这些问题，而不是解决这些问题。

著录项

来源
《Environmental science & policy》 |2019年第2019期|共3页
作者
Tamas Peter A.; Delaney Aogan; Crane Todd; Hengeveld Geerten M.;
展开▼
作者单位

Wageningen Univ POB 16 NL-6700 AA Wageningen Netherlands;

Wageningen Univ POB 16 NL-6700 AA Wageningen Netherlands;

Int Livestock Res Inst Nairobi Kenya;

Wageningen Univ POB 16 NL-6700 AA Wageningen Netherlands;

展开▼
收录信息
原文格式 PDF
正文语种 eng
中图分类环境科学、安全科学;
关键词
Reporting standards; Systematic review; Transparency; Reuse; Interdisciplinary research; Socio-ecological systems; Generalized knowledge claims; Synthesis;

机译：报告标准;系统审查;透明度;重用;跨学科研究;社会生态系统;广义知识要求;合成;

相似文献

外文文献
中文文献
专利

1. Reflections on and suggestions for reporting vulnerability research: How can peer reviewed articles reflect complex practice in low consensus fields such that they better support review and synthesis? [J] . Tamas Peter A., Delaney Aogan, Crane Todd, Environmental science & policy . 2019,第期

机译：报告漏洞研究的思考与建议：同行评审文章如何在低共识领域反映复杂的实践，以便更好地支持审查和综合？
2. Artifactual dimensions of visual rhetoric: what a content analysis of 114 peer-reviewed articles reveals about data collection reporting [J] . Abigail Selzer King, Michael J. McCarthy Technical communication quarterly . 2018,第3期

机译：视觉修辞的人为因素维度：对114篇同行评审文章的内容分析揭示了有关数据收集报告的内容
3. Meta-narrative analysis of sports injury reporting practices based on the Injury Definitions Concept Framework (IDCF): A review of consensus statements and epidemiological studies in athletics (track and field) [J] . Timpka Toomas, Jacobsson Jenny, Ekberg Joakim, Journal of science and medicine in sport . 2015,第6期

机译：基于伤害定义概念框架（IDCF）的运动损伤报告实践的元叙事分析：田径界（田径）共识声明和流行病学研究的回顾
4. Predicting Low vs. High Disparity between Peer and Expert Ratings in Peer Reviews of Physics Lab Reports [C] . Huy V. Nguyen, Diane J. Litman International conference on artificial intelligence in education . 2013

机译：在物理实验室报告的同行评审中预测同行和专家评级之间的高低差异
5. Using Peer Reviewed Journal Articles to Determine Requirements for Self-Aware Virtual Learning Systems [D] . Johnson, Cenetra K. 2020

机译：使用同行评审期刊文章确定自我意识虚拟学习系统的要求
6. Systematic Review of Methods in Low-Consensus Fields: Supporting Commensuration through `Construct-Centered Methods Aggregation’ in the Case of Climate Change Vulnerability Research [O] . Aogán Delaney, Peter A. Tamás, Todd A. Crane, -1

机译：对低共识领域方法的系统评价：在气候变化脆弱性研究的情况下通过以结构为中心的方法聚合来支持共通
7. The Framingham Offspring Study: a commentary1150th AnniversaryHistorical ArticleINTRODUCTIONIn this edition of the Journal, we release the fifth in a series of reviews of influential articles that have been previously published in ACC journals, including the American Journal of Cardiology(from 1958 to 1982) and JACC(from 1983 to the present). The publication of these articles is only one aspect of the ACC’s 50th anniversary commemoration, which highlights 50 years of leadership in cardiovascular care and education. The articles are intended to encourage reflection on the remarkable progress made in cardiovascular medicine over time, as well as to acknowledge the amazing prescience of some early investigators in anticipating and, in many cases, later guiding developments in their field.The working group responsible for selecting these articles and asking reviewers to write editorials solicited suggestions from the ACC’s clinical committees and individual members.The group achieved consensus fairly easily, including whom the group should ask to prepare the accompanying editorials. We initially drew up a list of 14 general areas to cover in this series, but later found that there are several major areas of modern cardiology, prominently molecular cardiology, in which the truly landmark articles have, alas, not yet been published in JACC. Therefore, the working group decided not to categorize by subject, but instead, to concentrate on the most important articles.The working group, a task force of the Subcommittee for the Commemoration of the ACC 50th Anniversary, owes a great deal to Ms. May A. Roustom and the efficient and tireless staff at Heart House for facilitating this project. We also wish to thank all who suggested articles and, most important, the authors who prepared reviews for their willingness to contribute their time and wisdom.Influential Articles in JACC Working GroupSharon A. Hunt, M.D., F.A.C.C.Rick A. Nishimura, M.D., F.A.C.C.H.J.C. Swan, M.D., Ph.D., M.A.C.C.Michael J. Wolk, M.D., F.A.C.C. [O] . Swan H.J.C 1999

机译：弗雷明汉后代研究：1150周年历史文章引言在本期杂志中，我们发布了一系列有影响力的文章的第五篇评论，这些评论先前已在ACC期刊上发表，包括《美国心脏病学杂志》（1958年至1982年）和《美国心脏病学会杂志》（从1983年至今）。这些文章的发表只是ACC成立50周年纪念的一个方面，该纪念日着重介绍了心血管护理和教育领域50年的领导地位。这些文章旨在鼓励人们对心血管医学随着时间的推移所取得的显着进展进行反思，并承认一些早期研究人员在预见并在许多情况下为他们领域的发展提供指导的惊人先见之明。选择这些文章并要求审稿人撰写社论，征求ACC临床委员会和个人成员的建议。该小组相当容易达成共识，包括该小组应要求谁准备随附的社论。我们最初拟出了本系列文章涵盖的14个常规领域的清单，但后来发现现代心脏病学有几个主要领域，主要是分子心脏病学，可惜的是，真正的具有里程碑意义的文章尚未在JACC上发表。因此，工作组决定不按主题进行分类，而是专注于最重要的文章。工作组是ACC成立50周年纪念小组委员会的一个工作组，在很大程度上要归功于梅女士。 A. Roustom和Heart House高效而孜孜不倦的员工为该项目提供了便利。我们还要感谢所有提出建议的文章，最重要的是感谢准备撰写评论以贡献自己的时间和智慧的作者.JACC工作组的有影响力的文章Sharon A. Swan，M.D.，Ph.D.，M.A.C.C. Michael J.Wolk，M.D.，F.A.C.C.
8. Conducting Airport Peer Reviews. A Synthesis of Airport Practice. [R] . Linsenmayer, K. R. C. 2013

机译：进行机场同行评审。机场实践综合。

Reflections on and suggestions for reporting vulnerability research: How can peer reviewed articles reflect complex practice in low consensus fields such that they better support review and synthesis?

摘要

著录项

相似文献

相关主题

期刊订阅