...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Food and Drug Law Journal >Food Fraud and the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act: Bridging a Disconnect
【24h】

Food Fraud and the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act: Bridging a Disconnect

机译：食品欺诈和食品，药物和美容法：桥接断开连接

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

To protect society's food supply, the term food fraud should be replaced with the term food adulteration when used by the crusaders against food fraud. The term food fraud causes confusion from a legal perspective because it requires an intent to harm in order to take any protective and enforcement measures. This is backwards and needs to be corrected. Replacing food fraud with food adulteration will remove scienter as an element and replace it with a strict liability standard, so that when the food supply is harmed, that alone is enough to take action against the perpetrator of the harm. There is too much at stake when it comes to society's health, businesses, and cultural requirements to permit a higher standard, specifically one that requires intent. Protecting society's food supply includes many definitions. For this article, I suggest the crusaders against food fraud adopt the term food adulteration as the umbrella term that includes economic adulteration, food fraud, economically motivated adulteration, and food terrorism (food defense). I also suggest FDA eliminate its working definition of economic adulteration and revert to the definition of adulteration found in statute.
机译：为了保护社会的粮食供应，应将术语欺诈术语掺杂，当十字军欺诈时使用术语掺假术语。术语欺诈使法律视角引起混淆，因为它需要意图伤害以采取任何保护和执法措施。这是向后，需要纠正。用食物掺假替代食物欺诈将把科学拆除为元素，并用严格的责任标准取代它，以便在食品供应受到伤害时，单独的是足以对伤害肇事者采取行动。当涉及社会的健康，企业和文化要求时，允许更高的标准，特别是需要意图的股权。保护社会的粮食供应包括许多定义。对于本文，我建议对食物欺诈的十字军，通过伞长，作为包括经济掺假，食物欺诈，经济动机的掺假和食品恐怖主义（粮食防御）的伞长。我还建议FDA消除其工作定义的经济掺假，并恢复法规中发现的掺假定义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号