• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Medical teacher >How are clinician-educators evaluated for educational excellence? A survey of promotion and tenure committee members in the United States
【24h】

How are clinician-educators evaluated for educational excellence? A survey of promotion and tenure committee members in the United States

机译：临床医生教育者如何评估教育卓越？ 美国促销委员会成员调查

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Background: In recent years, educational leaders have proposed domains of educational excellence and corresponding metrics to objectively measure contributions of clinician-educators for promotion and tenure (P&T). The purpose of this study was to explore whether P&T committees in United States (US) have incorporated these recommendations into practice. Method: The authors conducted a survey of P&T leaders across institutions in US. Items included questions related to institutional tracks for P&T, domains included in promotional packets, metrics for their measurement, and use of an Educator's Portfolio (EP). Results: Respondents from 55 institutions completed the survey. The presence of a teaching academy/society was associated with the presence of a promotion track for clinician-educators (p = 0.04). Only teaching activities (91%), assessment of learners (55%), and educational scholarship (51%) were required by a majority of institutions. Few institutions used objective methods for measuring impact and less than half (47%) required an EP. Discussion: These results highlight both progress in the recognition of clinician-educators while also suggesting discordance in the perspective of educational leaders and the practice of P&T committees. The authors advocate for establishing a national community of expert medical educators who may assist P&T committees in adopting consensus-based criteria and metrics to evaluate clinician-educators' contributions.
机译：背景：近年来，教育领导人提出了教育卓越和相应指标的域名，以客观地衡量临床医生教育者促进和任期的贡献（P＆T）。本研究的目的是探讨美国的P＆T委员会是否已将这些建议纳入实践中。方法：作者对跨美国机构的P＆T领导人进行了调查。项目包括与P＆T，促销数据包中包含的域名，测量指标的域名相关的问题，以及使用教育者的投资组合（EP）。结果：55机构的受访者完成了调查。教学学院/社会的存在与临床医生教育者的促销轨道有关（P = 0.04）。只有大多数机构需要教学活动（91％），评估学习者（55％）和教育奖学金（51％）。少数机构使用客观方法测量撞击，不到一半（47％）需要EP。讨论：这些结果突出了临床医生教育者的认可的进步，同时也表明在教育领导者的角度和P＆T委员会的实践中暗示了不胜调。作者倡导建立一个国家专家医学教育工作者社区，他们可以协助P＆T委员会采取基于共识的标准和指标来评估临床医生教育者的贡献。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Medical teacher》 |2019年第8期|共7页
  • 作者

    Ryan Michael S.; Tucker Constance; DiazGranados Deborah; Chandran Latha;

  • 作者单位

    Virginia Commonwealth Univ Sch Med Dept Pediat Richmond VA USA;

    Oregon Hlth &

    Sci Univ Off Provost Portland OR 97201 USA;

    Virginia Commonwealth Univ Sch Med Off Assessment Evaluat &

    Scholarship Richmond VA USA;

    SUNY Stony Brook Renaissance Sch Med Dept Pediat New York NY USA;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 医药、卫生;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号