• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Nursing research >Characteristics and Practices Within Research Partnerships for Health and Social Equity
【24h】

Characteristics and Practices Within Research Partnerships for Health and Social Equity

机译：卫生与社会公平研究伙伴关系中的特征和实践

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Background As federal research funding focuses more on academic/community collaborations to address health inequities, it is important to understand characteristics of these partnerships and how they work to achieve health equity outcomes. Objectives This study built on previous National Institutes of Health-funded research to (a) describe partnership characteristics and processes of federally funded, community-based participatory research (CBPR) or community-engaged research projects; (b) explore characteristics of these projects by stage of funding; and (c) build on previous understanding of partnership promising practices. Methods Between fall 2016 and spring 2017, we completed a cross-sectional analysis and principal component analysis of online survey data from key informants of federally funded CBPR and community-engaged research projects. Respondents for 179 projects (53% response rate) described project characteristics (e.g., type of partner, stage of partnership, and population) and the use of promising practices (e.g., stewardship, advisory board roles, training topics) by stage of partnership. Results Projects involved community, healthcare, and government partners, with 49% of respondents reporting their project was in the early stage of funding. More projects focused on Black/African American populations, whereas principal investigators were mostly White. The more established a partnership (e.g., with multiple projects), the more likely it employed the promising practices of stewardship (i.e., community safeguards for approval), community advisory boards, and training on values and power. Conclusions Community engagement is a developmental process with differences between early-stage and established CBPR partnerships. Engaging in active reflection and adopting promising partnering practices are important for CBPR partnerships working to improve health equity. The data provided in this study provide key indicators for reflection.
机译：背景技术随着联邦研究资金更多地关注学术/社区合作来解决健康不公平，了解这些伙伴关系的特征以及他们如何努力实现健康股权结果。目的这项研究建立在以前的国家核心资助研究机构（a）描述了联邦资助，基于社区的参与性研究（CBPR）或社区聘用的研究项目的伙伴关系特征和流程; （b）按资金阶段探讨这些项目的特点; （c）建立先前对伙伴关系承诺做法的理解。 2016年秋季与2017年春季之间的方法，我们从联邦资助的CBPR和社区从事研究项目的主要信息人员完成了对在线调查数据的横断面分析和主要成分分析。 179个项目的受访者（53％的响应率）描述了项目特征（例如，合作伙伴类型，伙伴关系阶段和人口）以及通过伙伴关系阶段使用有前途的做法（例如，管理委员会，培训课程）。结果项目涉及社区，医疗保健和政府合作伙伴，49％的受访者报告其项目是在资金的早期阶段。更多项目专注于黑人/非洲裔美国人口，而主要调查人员大多是白色的。伙伴关系越多（有多个项目），它就越有可能采用有希望的管理行为（即，社区保障审批），社区咨询委员会和价值观和权力培训。结论社区参与是一个发展过程，早期阶段和建立了CBPR伙伴关系的差异。从事积极的反思和采用有希望的合作实践对于努力提高健康股权的CBPR伙伴关系很重要。本研究中提供的数据提供了反射的关键指标。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号