...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Science and engineering ethics >This 'Ethical Trap' Is for Roboticists, Not Robots: On the Issue of Artificial Agent Ethical Decision-Making
【24h】

This 'Ethical Trap' Is for Roboticists, Not Robots: On the Issue of Artificial Agent Ethical Decision-Making

机译：这种“伦理陷阱”是针对机器人，而不是机器人：关于人工代理道德决策的问题

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

In this paper we address the question of when a researcher is justified in describing his or her artificial agent as demonstrating ethical decision-making. The paper is motivated by the amount of research being done that attempts to imbue artificial agents with expertise in ethical decision-making. It seems clear that computing systems make decisions, in that they make choices between different options; and there is scholarship in philosophy that addresses the distinction between ethical decision-making and general decision-making. Essentially, the qualitative difference between ethical decisions and general decisions is that ethical decisions must be part of the process of developing ethical expertise within an agent. We use this distinction in examining publicity surrounding a particular experiment in which a simulated robot attempted to safeguard simulated humans from falling into a hole. We conclude that any suggestions that this simulated robot was making ethical decisions were misleading.
机译：在本文中，我们解决了研究人员在将他或她的人工代理人描述为展示道德决策时的问题的问题。本文的推动是在进行的研究中，试图用伦理决策的专业知识灌塑人工代理。似乎清楚的是，计算系统做出决策，因为他们在不同选择之间做出选择;在哲学中有奖学金，解决了道德决策与一般决策的区别。基本上，道德决策与一般决定之间的定性差异是道德决策必须是在代理商内制定道德专业知识的一部分。我们在审查特定实验的宣传中使用这种区分，其中模拟机器人试图保护uMipmate的人类从落入孔中。我们得出结论，这种模拟机器人在做出道德决策的任何建议都是误导性的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号