• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Society and Natural Resources >Political Alienation, Rurality and the Symbolic Role of Swedish Wolf Policy
【24h】

Political Alienation, Rurality and the Symbolic Role of Swedish Wolf Policy

机译：瑞典狼政策的政治异化，风险和象征性作用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Attitudes towards wolf policy are likely to be driven by perceived differences in political power between urban and rural groups. Using Swedish survey data collected in 2014 and structural equation modeling, I evaluated the effects of political alienation. Political alienation mediated the effect of having an urban or rural place of residence on attitudes towards wolf policy. Politically alienated individuals also preferred more extreme policy options than other respondents, while being less likely to approve of the current wolf policy in Sweden. These findings suggest that political alienation drives attitude polarization in wolf related social conflicts. Awareness of these underlying power asymmetries could possibly increase both policy legitimacy and management efficiency. This highlights the importance of accounting for social context in relation to policy-making and conservation efforts related to wolves.
机译：狼政策的态度可能是通过城乡群体之间的政治权力差异而导致的。 使用2014年收集的瑞典调查数据和结构方程建模，我评估了政治异化的影响。 政治异化介绍了在沃尔夫政策的态度上拥有城市或农村居住地的效果。 政治疏远的个人也比其他受访者更优先于其他政策选择，同时不太可能批准瑞典目前的狼政策。 这些调查结果表明，政治异化推动了狼相关社会冲突中的态度极化。 对这些潜在的权力不对称的认识可能会增加政策合法性和管理效率。 这突出了与狼群相关的政策制定和保护努力核算社会背景的重要性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号