...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Surgical laparoscopy, endoscopy and percutaneous techniques >Is the Use of a Robotic Camera Holder Economically Viable? A Cost Comparison of Surgical Assistant Versus the Use of a Robotic Camera Holder in Laparoscopic Liver Resections
【24h】

Is the Use of a Robotic Camera Holder Economically Viable? A Cost Comparison of Surgical Assistant Versus the Use of a Robotic Camera Holder in Laparoscopic Liver Resections

机译：是使用机器人相机架的经济上可行吗？ 外科助理的成本比较与腹腔镜肝切除术中的机器人相机架使用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The laparoscopic approach has gained acceptance in the field of hepatopancreaticobiliary surgery. It offers several advantages including reduced blood loss, reduced postoperative pain, and shorter length of stay. However, long operating times can be associated with surgeon and assistant fatigue and image tremor. Robotic camera holders have been designed to overcome these drawbacks but may come with significant costs. The aim of this study was to economically evaluate their use compared with standard assistants using a single surgeon consecutive series of laparoscopic liver resections from January 2014 to May 2015. Only use of nurse assistants with no advanced training and postgraduate year 2 doctors were cheaper than utilization of the device. We suggest the use of a robotic camera holder is cost-beneficial and may have wider service and educational benefits.
机译：腹腔镜方法在肝癌手术领域获得了接受。 它提供了几个优点，包括减少损伤，术后疼痛减少，逗留时间较短。 然而，长期运营时间可以与外科医生和助理疲劳和图像震颤有关。 机器人相机架旨在克服这些缺点，但可能具有大量成本。 本研究的目的是经济地评估它们的使用与2015年1月至2015年5月的单一外科医生连续系列的腹腔镜肝切除术相比，他们的使用。只使用没有先进的培训和研究生第2岁的医生的护士助理比利用便宜 设备的。 我们建议使用机器人相机持有人是成本有利的，可能具有更广泛的服务和教育效益。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号