...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Supportive care in cancer: official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer >Healthcare provider utility ratings of a psychosocial screening summary: from diagnosis to 6 months
【24h】

Healthcare provider utility ratings of a psychosocial screening summary: from diagnosis to 6 months

机译：医疗保健提供者公用事业额定到心理社会筛查摘要：从诊断到6个月

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Background Psychosocial screening has been proposed as a core standard of care in pediatric oncology. However, there has been limited application of this standard thus far. Understanding healthcare provider (HCP) attitudes towards psychosocial screening is an important element towards furthering implementation initiatives of standard screening practices in pediatric oncology. Objective To compare HCP perceptions of the utility of a psychosocial risk summary by discipline (oncologist, nurse, social worker), risk level (Universal, Targeted, Clinical) derived from the Psychosocial Assessment Tool (PAT), and time (shortly after a child's diagnosis [T1] and 6 months later [T2]). Method All participating HCPs (oncologists, nurses, social workers) were asked to rate how useful they found the psychosocial risk summary using a visual analogue scale (VAS). Results The psychosocial risk summary was perceived as equally useful across providers (oncologists, nurses, social workers) and PAT risk levels at T1. At T2, the psychosocial risk summary was perceived as more useful by oncologists and nurses than social workers, and summaries indicating elevated risk were perceived as more useful than those indicating low risk. Overall, healthcare providers reported greater utility of psychosocial risk summary near diagnosis compared with 6 months later, largely driven by lower utility ratings reported by social workers at T2. Conclusion Understanding perceived utility and factors affecting perceived utility is a key component to designing effective implementation strategies for systematic psychosocial screening. Active engagement of HCPs in the screening process is critical in improving implementation of psychosocial screening throughout pediatric cancer treatment.
机译：背景技术心理社会筛查已被提议作为儿科肿瘤学的核心护理标准。然而，到目前为止，本标准的应用有限。了解医疗保健提供者（HCP）对心理社会筛查的态度是进一步进一步执行儿科肿瘤学中标准筛查实践的执行措施的重要因素。目的比较纪律（肿瘤科，护士，社会工作人员），源自心理社会评估工具（PAT）和时间（在儿童之后不久）的风险水平（肿瘤科学，护士，社会工作人员），风险水平（普遍，有针对性，临床）的HCP认识诊断[T1]和6个月后[T2]）。方法所有参与的HCP（肿瘤学家，护士，社会工作者）都被要求评估他们使用视觉模拟量表（VAS）发现的心理社会风险概要有用。结果心理社会风险概要被认为是在提供者（肿瘤学家，护士，社会工作者）和T1的危险水平方面同样有用。在T2，心理社会风险概要被认为是肿瘤科学家和护士更有用的，而不是社会工作者，并且表明风险升高的摘要被认为比表明低风险的风险更有用。总体而言，医疗保健提供者报告了与6个月相比的诊断附近的心理社会风险概要的效用，而且主要由社会工作者报告的较低的公用事业额度在T2报告的情况下。结论了解感知的效用和影响感知效用的因素是设计有效实施策略的系统性心理社会筛查的关键组成部分。 HCP在筛选过程中的主动参与对于改善整个小儿癌症治疗的心理社会筛查的实施至关重要。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号