• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Physica Scripta: An International Journal for Experimental and Theoretical Physics >Science facilities and stakeholder management: how a pan-European research facility ended up in a small Swedish university town
【24h】

Science facilities and stakeholder management: how a pan-European research facility ended up in a small Swedish university town

机译：科学设施和利益相关方管理：泛欧研究设施如何在一个小型瑞典大学城结束

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

This is the story of how a large research facility of broad European and global interest, the European Spallation Source (ESS), ended up in the small university town of Lund in Sweden. This happened in spite of the fact that a number of influential European countries were at one time or another competitors to host the facility. It is also a story about politics which attempts to illustrate how closely intertwined politics and science are, and how the interplay between those interests affects scientific progress. ESS became an arena for individual ambitions and political manoeuvring. The different stakeholders, in their striving to ensure that their own interests were realised, in various ways and with different degrees of success over the years, have influenced the key decisions that, during the already 30 year history of ESS, have driven the course that this project has taken. What emerges is that the interests of the stakeholders and the interests of the project itself are frequently not in harmony. This imposes challenges on the management of large research facilities as they have to not only navigate in the scientific landscape, which they often are more familiar with, but also in the political landscape. This story is therefore an attempt to shed light on the role of managers of large research facilities and the often delicate balancing act they have to perform when trying to comply with the different and often conflicting stakeholder interests. What is especially worthwhile examining, as we do in this paper, is the role that individuals, and the interaction between individuals, have played in the process. This shows that the focus of stakeholder theory on organisations, rather than the people in the organisations, needs to be redirected on to the individuals representing those organisations and their interrelationships. At the same time it is clear that the developing field of stakeholder management theory has not emerged into the consciousness of science facility managers or their governing bodies and is far down the list of priorities of researchers who use the facilities.
机译：这是欧洲偏离源（ESS）的广泛欧洲和全球兴趣的大型研究机构如何实现的故事，最终位于瑞典的小型大学隆德镇。尽管有许多有影响力的欧洲国家是一次举办工厂的竞争对手的事实。它也是一个关于政治的故事，这些故障试图说明与政治和科学有多紧密密切相关的，以及这些兴趣之间的相互作用如何影响科学进步。 ESS成为个人野心和政治机动的舞台。不同的利益相关者在他们努力确保自己的利益，以各种方式和多年来的不同程度的成功，影响了在已有30年的ESS历史中的关键决策，已经推动了课程这个项目已经采取。出现的是，利益攸关方的利益和项目本身的利益通常不和谐。这对大型研究设施的管理造成了挑战，因为他们不仅必须在科学景观中导航，它们往往更熟悉，而且在政治景观中。因此，这个故事是试图阐明大型研究设施管理者的角色，并且在试图遵守不同和经常相互冲突的利益相关者兴趣时，他们必须进行的经常微妙的平衡行为。正如我们在本文所做的那样，特别值得审查的是，这是个人的角色以及个人之间的互动，在该过程中发挥了作用。这表明利益相关者对组织的焦点，而不是组织中的人员，需要重定向到代表这些组织及其相互关系的人。与此同时，很明显，利益相关者管理理论的发展领域并没有出现在科学设施管理者或其理事机构的意识中，远远落后于使用该设施的研究人员的优先事项清单。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号