• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Psychological science: a journal of the American Psychological Society >Why Hate the Good Guy? Antisocial Punishment of High Cooperators Is Greater When People Compete To Be Chosen
【24h】

Why Hate the Good Guy? Antisocial Punishment of High Cooperators Is Greater When People Compete To Be Chosen

机译：为什么讨厌好人？ 当人们竞争选择时，对高合作者的反社会惩罚更大

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

When choosing social partners, people prefer good cooperators (all else being equal). Given this preference, people wishing to be chosen can either increase their own cooperation to become more desirable or suppress others' cooperation to make them less desirable. Previous research shows that very cooperative people sometimes get punished ("antisocial punishment") or criticized ("do-gooder derogation") in many cultures. Here, we used a public-goods game with punishment to test whether antisocial punishment is used as a means of competing to be chosen by suppressing others' cooperation. As predicted, there was more antisocial punishment when participants were competing to be chosen for a subsequent cooperative task (a trust game) than without a subsequent task. This difference in antisocial punishment cannot be explained by differences in contributions, moralistic punishment, or confusion. This suggests that antisocial punishment is a social strategy that low cooperators use to avoid looking bad when high cooperators escalate cooperation.
机译：选择社会伙伴时，人们更喜欢良好的合作者（其他一切平等）。鉴于这一偏好，希望被选中的人可以增加自己的合作，以便更为理想或更加抑制他人的合作，使他们不太理想。以前的研究表明，非常合作的人有时会受到惩罚（“反社会惩罚”）或在许多文化中批评（“做好事业贬损”）。在这里，我们使用了一项公共产品游戏，以惩罚进行反社会惩罚是否被抑制其他人的合作选择竞争的手段。如预测，当参与者竞争被选为随后的合作任务（信托比赛）而不是随后的任务时，有更多的反社会惩罚。反社会惩罚的这种差异不能通过贡献，道德惩罚或混乱的差异来解释。这表明反社会惩罚是一种社会战略，即低合作者在高合作者升级合作时避免看起来很糟糕。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号