• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Technology,knowledge and learning: Learning mathematics,science and the art in the context of figital technologies >Students Vote: A Comparative Study of Student Perceptions of Three Popular Web-Based Student Response Systems
【24h】

Students Vote: A Comparative Study of Student Perceptions of Three Popular Web-Based Student Response Systems

机译：学生投票：对三个流行的基于网络学生响应系统的学生看法的比较研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

One way to use formative feedback to increase student engagement is through a student response system (SRS). Originally appearing as classroom "clickers," very little literature exists concerning the ease of use, usefulness and integration, and overall satisfaction of current SRS software smartphone applications. Using the technology acceptance model as a guide, this study uses a mixed methods approach concerning student perceptions of three distinct SRS used in multiple sections of a university undergraduate statistics course. The quantitative results demonstrated significant differences between SRS, while follow-up qualitative questions clarified the Likert-scale data. "All else being equal, the easier system is to interact with, the less effort needed to operate it, the more effort one can allocate the other activities" (Davis1989, p. 334). With all data considered, students preferred theSocrativeapp over bothTopHatandLearning Catalytics.
机译：使用形成性反馈的一种方法来增加学生参与的是通过学生响应系统（SRS）。 最初出现为课堂“咔哒声”，非常小的文学存在，易于使用，有用和集成以及当前SRS软件智能手机应用的总体满意度。 本研究采用了技术验收模型作为指导，采用了一个混合方法方法，了解大学本科统计课程多个部分中使用的三个不同SRS的学生看法。 定量结果表明了SRS之间的显着差异，而后续定性问题澄清了李克特级数据。 “一切平等，更容易的系统是与操作互动，操作所需的努力越多，可以分配另一个活动的努力”（Davis1989，第334页）。 随着所有数据考虑，学生更优先于博博立特切催化剂的ThesocrativeAPP。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号