...
首页> 外文期刊>The Australian and New Zealand journal of psychiatry >Development of scales to assess mental health literacy relating to recognition of and interventions for depression, anxiety disorders and schizophrenia/psychosis
【24h】

Development of scales to assess mental health literacy relating to recognition of and interventions for depression, anxiety disorders and schizophrenia/psychosis

机译:发展尺度以评估抑郁症,焦虑障碍和精神分裂症/精神病患者的心理健康识字

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objective: The aim of this study was to develop scales to assess mental health literacy relating to affective disorders, anxiety disorders and schizophrenia/psychosis. Method: Scales were created to assess mental health literacy in relation to depression, depression with suicidal thoughts, early schizophrenia, chronic schizophrenia, social phobia and post-traumatic stress disorder using data from a survey of 1536 health professionals (general practitioners, clinical psychologists and psychiatrists), assessing recognition of these disorders and beliefs about the helpfulness of interventions. This was done by using the consensus of experts about the helpfulness and harmfulness of treatments for each disorder as a criterion. Data from a general population survey of 6019 Australians aged = 15 was used to examine associations between scale scores, exposure to mental disorders and sociodemographic variables, to assess scale validity. Results: Those with a close friend or family member with a mental disorder had significantly higher mean scores on all mental health literacy scales, providing support for scale validity. Personal experience of the problem and working with people with a similar problem was linked to higher scores on some scales. Male sex, a lower level of education and age > 60 were linked to lower levels of mental health literacy. Higher scores were also linked to a greater belief that people with mental disorders are sick rather than weak. Conclusions: The scales developed in this study allow for the assessment of mental health literacy in relation to depression, depression with suicidal thoughts, early schizophrenia, chronic schizophrenia, social phobia and PTSD. Those with exposure to mental disorders had higher scores on the scales, and analyses of the links between scale scores and sociodemographic variables of age, gender and level of education were in line with those seen in other studies, providing support for scale validity.
机译:目的:该研究的目的是开发尺度,以评估与情感障碍,焦虑症和精神分裂症/精神病有关的心理健康识字。方法:创建尺度,以评估与抑郁症有关的心理健康识字,患有自杀性思想,早期精神分裂症,慢性精神分裂症,社交恐惧症和创伤后应激障碍的抑郁症,使用来自1536名卫生专业人员的调查(全科医生,临床心理学家和精神科医生),评估对这些疾病的认可和对干预措施的乐于助人的信念。这是通过使用专家的共识,了解每个疾病的治疗的乐于和危害作为标准。来自6019岁澳大利亚人的一般人口调查的数据用于审查规模分数,暴露于精神障碍和社会渗透变量之间的关联,以评估规模有效性。结果:具有精神障碍的密友或家庭成员的人在所有心理健康识字尺度上具有明显更高的平均分数,为规模有效性提供支持。问题的个人经验和与具有类似问题的人合作与一些秤上的更高分数相关联。男性性别,较低的教育水平和年龄> 60与较低的心理健康素养相连。较高的分数也与更大的信念相连,即精神障碍的人生病而不是弱者。结论:本研究中开发的尺度允许评估与抑郁症有关的心理健康识字,抑郁症,患有自杀思想,早期精神分裂症,慢性精神分裂症,社会恐惧症和应激障碍。那些接触精神障碍的人在尺度上具有较高的分数,并分析了规模评分和年龄的社会性评数之间的联系,性别和教育水平的级别符合其他研究中看到的那些,提供了对规模有效性的支持。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号