...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>The Canadian journal of hospital pharmacy. >Perceptions of Hospital Pharmacists Concerning Clinical Research: A Survey Study
【24h】

Perceptions of Hospital Pharmacists Concerning Clinical Research: A Survey Study

机译：关于临床研究的医院药剂师的看法：调查研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Background: Few studies have attempted to determine the proportion of Canadian hospital pharmacists involved in clinical research, despite a general consensus that research should be an essential component of a pharmacists professional role.Objectives: The primary objective was to characterize the involvement in clinical pharmacy research of hospital pharmacists in the 4 health authorities of the Lower Mainland of British Columbia (collectively known as the Lower Mainland Pharmacy Services). The secondary objective was to identify perceived barriers to conducting research.Methods: Pharmacists employed within Lower Mainland Pharmacy Services were invited to participate in an online cross-sectional survey, for completion in August and September 2015. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the results. Groups of survey participants were compared to examine differences in measured outcomes.Results: A total of 534 pharmacists were surveyed, with a response rate of 16% (85/534). Overall, 77% (55/71) of the respondents reported having participated in research, and 87% (62/71) expressed interest in conducting future research. Chart reviews (78%, 36/46) and surveys (41%, 19/46) were the most common study designs used in prior research. Participants self-identified their research-related strengths as literature evaluation (46%, 27/59) and hypothesis generation (44%, 26/59). Conversely, 81% (48/59) of respondents self-identified statistical analysis as a weakness. Most respondents stated that personal satisfaction (82%, 49/60) and the opportunity to learn about disease states (78%, 47/60) were the driving factors for conducting research. The most commonly cited barrier to conducting research was lack of time (92%, 55/60). Opportunities to join existing teams (73%, 44/60) and mentor-ship programs (70%, 42/60) were identified as the most popular arrangements for encouraging future research.Conclusions: Most of the pharmacists who responded to this survey reported having participated in clinical pharmacy research, but a lack of dedicated time appears to be a major hurdle to greater research participation. A targeted program increasing exposure to existing research teams and mentorship opportunities is recommended for promoting future research.
机译：背景：虽然有一般性共识，但近几项研究已经确定了参与临床研究的加拿大医院药剂师的比例，因为研究应该是药剂师专业角色的重要组成部分。目的是表征临床药学研究的参与。在不列颠哥伦比亚省下大陆的4卫生当局的医院药剂师（统称为较低的内地药房服务）。次要目标是识别对进行研究的感知障碍。方法：邀请较低内地药房服务中雇用的药剂师参加在线横断面调查，于2015年8月和9月完成。使用描述性统计数据来分析结果。比较调查参与者的群体以检查测量结果的差异。结果：共调查534名药剂师，响应率为16％（85/534）。总体而言，77％（55/71）的受访者报告参加研究，87％（62/71）表示令人兴趣进行未来的研究。图表评论（78％，36/46）和调查（41％，19/46）是先前研究中使用的最常见的研究设计。与会者将其与文学评估（46％，27/59）和假设发电（44％，26/59）的研究有关的优势。相反，81％（48/59）的受访者将自我确定的统计分析为弱点。大多数受访者表示，个人满意度（82％，49/60）和学习疾病国家的机会（78％，47/60）是进行研究的驱动因素。对进行研究的最常用的屏障缺乏时间（92％，55/60）。加入现有团队的机会（73％，44/60）和导师 - 船舶计划（70％，42/60）被确定为鼓励未来研究的最受欢迎的安排。结论：据回复本调查的大多数药剂师报告参加了临床药学研究，但缺乏敬业的时间似乎是提高研究参与的主要障碍。建议在促进未来研究方面增加对现有研究团队和指导机会的接触的目标方案。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号