• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>The Entomologist's Record and Journal of Variation >QUANTITATIVE COMPARISON OF CATCHES MADE BY TWO BULBS FITTED TO ROBINSON MOTH-TRAPS
【24h】

QUANTITATIVE COMPARISON OF CATCHES MADE BY TWO BULBS FITTED TO ROBINSON MOTH-TRAPS

机译：两个灯泡捕获到罗宾逊蛾陷阱的捕捞量的定量比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

In a 53-night comparison, a Robinson trap with a 125-watt MBF bulb caught 2.1 times as many individual macro-moths and 1.7 times as many species/night as an "Eco-Robinson" trap (an identical trap body with a 20-watt Wemlite bulb). Statistically, bothdifferences were highly significant. The MBF bulb caught more individual moths than the Wemlite bulb on 49 of the 53 nights and more species on 46 nights. The MBF bulb emitted 7.4 times as much total radiation as the Wemlite, with 72 times as much UVB, 1.6 times as much UVA and 34 times as much visible radiation. Under new legislation, MBF and similar bulbs with >0.1% mercury are banned in the EU. More reliance will have to be placed on legal substitutes such as the above Wemlite bulb, new multi-tube Actinic traps and new LED sources. No commercially available replacement product has yet been shown to rival the moth-catching ability of MBF, MBU and similar high-pressure mercury-vapour bulbs of 125 and higher wattages. Methods of comparing bulbs, such as that used here, may therefore be useful in assessing new bulbs and traps as they become available.
机译：在53晚的比较中，一个带有125瓦MBF灯泡的罗宾逊陷阱捕获了每种宏观运动的2.1倍，以及许多物种/夜晚的1.7倍，作为“生态罗宾逊”陷阱（一个相同的陷阱身体，有20 -watt wemlite灯泡）。统计上，两种都非常重要。 MBF灯泡比53晚的49个晚上49个晚上的Wemlite灯泡捕获了更多的蛾子。 MBF灯泡作为WEMlite的总辐射的7.4倍，具有72倍的UVB，UVA的1.6倍，可见辐射的34倍。在新的立法下，欧盟禁止禁止MBF和> 0.1％汞的类似灯泡。更多的依赖必须将依赖于法律替代品，例如上述Wemlite灯泡，新的多管散步陷阱和新的LED源。没有商业替代产品尚未显示竞争MBF，MBU和类似的高压汞蒸气灯泡的蛾捕捉能力，竞争能力为125和更高的功率。因此，比较灯泡的方法，例如在此处使用的方法，可以在评估新的灯泡和陷阱时可用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号