首页> 外文期刊>The journal of forensic psychiatry & psychology >Anxiety disorders and intimate partner violence: can the association be explained by coexisting conditions or borderline personality traits?
【24h】

Anxiety disorders and intimate partner violence: can the association be explained by coexisting conditions or borderline personality traits?

机译:焦虑症和亲密的合作伙伴暴力:可以通过共存条件或边界人格特征来解释协会吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Intimate partner violence (IPV) is a serious, preventable public health problem. IPV perpetration is strongly associated with Anxiety disorders at the population level. We investigated whether the association could be explained by coexisting psychiatric conditions or Borderline personality traits, using a combined data-set of two National Household Surveys (n = 15,973). Results showed women were more likely to report perpetrating IPV than men. Anxiety disorders were associated with IPV. When coexisting psychiatric conditions together with a categorical diagnosis of Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD) were investigated as explanatory variables, 19.2% of the association between Anxiety disorders and IPV was explained. Using individual Borderline traits in place of a categorical diagnosis of BPD, 58.3% of the association was explained. In conclusion, the association between Anxiety disorders and IPV was partly, but not fully, explained by coexisting psychiatric conditions and individual Borderline traits. Perpetrators of IPV should be screened for Anxiety disorders and among those with Anxiety disorders, Borderline traits are important.
机译:亲密的合作伙伴暴力(IPV)是一个严重,可预防的公共卫生问题。 IPV嗜睡与人口水平的焦虑症密切相关。我们调查了如何通过共存精神病条件或边界人格特征来解释该协会,使用两个国家家庭调查的组合数据集(n = 15,973)。结果表明,女性更有可能报告的是IPV而不是男性。焦虑症与IPV有关。当调查与边界人格障碍(BPD)的分类诊断一起将精神诊断作为解释性变量,解释了焦虑症和IPV之间的19.2%。使用单独的边缘性特征代替BPD的分类诊断,解释了58.3%的协会。总之,焦虑症和IPV之间的关联部分,但不完全通过共存精神病条件和个别边界特征来解释。 IPV的肇事者应筛查焦虑症,患有焦虑障碍的人,边界特征很重要。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号