• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>The journal of sexual medicine >Prevalence of Female Sexual Function Difficulties and Sexual Pain Assessed by the Female Sexual Function Index: A Systematic Review
【24h】

Prevalence of Female Sexual Function Difficulties and Sexual Pain Assessed by the Female Sexual Function Index: A Systematic Review

机译：女性性功能的患病率困难和女性性功能指数评估的性疼痛：系统审查

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

IntroductionSexual difficulties, and sexual pain in particular, represent a global health issue for women, and their prevalence has been shown to differ across countries. AimTo review the existing literature on the prevalence of female sexual difficulties and sexual pain worldwide measured by the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI). MethodsWe conducted a systematic literature review based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Included were peer-reviewed publications indicating prevalence rates of female sexual difficulties based on the FSFI and cutoff values. Studies with samples limited to a certain age group or health condition were excluded. Main Outcome MeasureThe outcome measure includes cutoff values and prevalence rates for sexual difficulties and sexual pain, as well as sample characteristics. Results22 studies conducted in 11 countries were included. These examined samples from the community, patient records, health care staff, or the Internet. Various prevalence cutoff values were applied. Prevalence rates of overall sexual difficulties ranged between 5.5% and 77%. For sexual pain, rates from 3% to 95.5% were found. A comparison between countries was restricted due to differences in sample size, sample type, and applied cutoffs. Representative community samples using comparable cutoffs found that 5.8–63.3% of women experience general sexual difficulty and 6–31.6% experience sexual pain. Clinical ImplicationsSexual difficulties and sexual pain are prevalent in all examined countries, and despite restrictions to interpretability, the large prevalence rates point to the necessity of further clinical research. Strength & LimitationsMany studies had to be excluded because of missing data. The comparison of studies is descriptive, and not all regions worldwide are represented. Nevertheless, results of the review were useful to derive recommendations for reporting of future studies using the FSFI. ConclusionThis review is the first comparison of prevalence studies based on the FSFI. It reflects the extent of available research and limitations in comparability.Koops TU, Briken P. Prevalence of Female Sexual Function Difficulties and Sexual Pain Assessed by the Female Sexual Function Index: A Systematic Review. J Sex Med 2018;15:1591–1599.
机译：介绍性困难，特别是性痛，代表妇女的全球健康问题，普遍存在的普遍存在各国不同。 AIMTO审查现有文学对女性性函数指数（FSFI）衡量的女性性困难和性疼痛的患病率。方法网络根据系统评论和Meta-Analys指南的首选报告项目进行了系统文献综述。包括对同行评审的出版物，表明基于FSFI和截止值的女性性困难的流行率。除了限于某种年龄组或健康状况的样本的研究被排除在外。主要结果测量结果措施包括用于性困难和性疼痛的截止值和患病率，以及样本特征。包括在11个国家进行的结果22研究。这些检查了社区，患者记录，医疗保健人员或互联网的样本。应用了各种流行截止值。整体性困难的流行率范围为5.5％和77％。对于性疼痛，发现了3％至95.5％的率。由于样品大小，样品类型和应用截止值，各国之间的比较受到限制。代表性社区样本采用可比截止值发现，5.8-63.3％的女性经历一般性困难，6-31.6％的性疼痛经验。在所有审查的国家，临床含义困难和性疼痛在所有审查的国家都普遍存在，尽管对解释性限制，但普遍存在的普及率指出了进一步临床研究的必要性。由于数据缺失，必须排除强度和限制的研究。研究的比较是描述性的，而不是全世界所有地区的代表。尽管如此，审查的结果对于使用FSFI进行报告的建议是有用的。结论本综述是基于FSFI的流行研究的第一次比较。它反映了可比性研究和局限性的可比性研究和局限性。TU，Briken P.患有女性性功能困难和性疼痛的女性性功能指数评估：系统审查。 J SEX MED 2018; 15：1591-1599。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号