• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>AIDS care. >Persuading, protesting and exchanging favours: strategies used by Indian sex workers to win local support for their HIV prevention programmes.
【24h】

Persuading, protesting and exchanging favours: strategies used by Indian sex workers to win local support for their HIV prevention programmes.

机译：说服，抗议和交换利益：印度性工作者为赢得当地艾滋病毒预防计划支持所采用的策略。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Given that the communities which are most vulnerable to HIV often have little control over their own lives and their health-related behaviour, HIV prevention policies increasingly recommend that HIV prevention projects work to build relationships with powerful external groups (i.e., build "bridging social capital"). To aid conceptualisation of how community organisations may build such social capital, this paper outlines a typology of strategies for influencing local stakeholders. We present a study of two successful Indian sex workers' organisations, VAMP and DMSC, focusing on how the organisations have influenced three groups of stakeholders, namely police, politicians and local social organisations. Interviews with project employees (45), with representatives of the three groups of stakeholders (12) and fieldwork diaries recording 6 months of observation in each site provide the data. Three approaches emerged. "Persuading" refers to the practice of holding information-giving meetings with stakeholders and requesting their support. It appears to build "weak social ties". Protesting be useful when the stakeholder has a public image to protect that would be tarnished by protest, and when the protestors can stake a legitimate claim that their rights are being denied. In "exchanging favours", the sex workers' organisations find creative ways to position themselves as offering valued resources to their stakeholders (such as useful information on criminal activities for the police, a stage and audience for politicians or a celebration for local social organisations) as incentives for their support. In conclusion, we discuss the strengths and weaknesses of each approach, the implications for social capital theorising and implications for community HIV prevention.
机译：鉴于最容易受到艾滋病毒侵害的社区通常对自己的生活和与健康相关的行为几乎没有控制权，艾滋病毒预防政策越来越建议艾滋病毒预防项目致力于与强大的外部群体建立关系（即建立“桥接社会资本”）。 ”）。为了帮助社区组织如何建立这种社会资本的概念化，本文概述了影响当地利益相关者的策略类型。我们对两个成功的印度性工作者组织VAMP和DMSC进行了研究，重点研究了这些组织如何影响了三类利益相关者，即警察，政客和当地社会组织。与项目员工的访谈（45），三组利益相关者的代表（12）以及记录每个站点6个月观察结果的实地考察日记提供了数据。出现了三种方法。 “说服力”是指与利益相关者举行信息发布会并请求他们支持的做法。看来建立了“弱社会联系”。当利益相关者具有保护公众形象的抗议活动时，抗议会有用，而抗议者可以提出合法权利主张，即他们的权利被剥夺，则抗议是有用的。在“交换利益”中，性工作者组织找到了创新的方式来定位自己，向利益相关者提供宝贵的资源（例如，有关警方犯罪活动的有用信息，政客的舞台和听众或当地社会组织的庆祝活动）激励他们的支持。最后，我们讨论了每种方法的优缺点，对社会资本理论的意义以及对社区艾滋病毒预防的意义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号