...
首页> 外文期刊>Trends in Ecology & Evolution >A guide for evaluating and reporting map data quality: Affirming Shao et al. 'Overselling overall map accuracy misinforms about research reliability'
【24h】

A guide for evaluating and reporting map data quality: Affirming Shao et al. 'Overselling overall map accuracy misinforms about research reliability'

机译:评估和报告地图数据质量指南:肯定申请。 “超越整体地图精度误解研究可靠性”

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Context Landscape ecologists often use thematic map data in their research. Greater familiarity with thematic map accuracy assessment protocols will enhance appropriate use and interpretation of map quality data. Objectives Provide an overview of thematic map accuracy assessment protocols and simple, non-quantitative guidelines to assess the quality of the thematic map data that landscape ecologists use in their research. Methods Synthesis and interpretation of salient literature on map accuracy assessment. Conclusions Landscape ecologists can adopt three simple rules to improve their use and interpretation of map data: (1) use the map quality data only if the accuracy assessment protocols adhere to rigorous, well-established standards for the sampling design, response design, and analysis; (2) focus on class-specific accuracy via user's and producer's accuracies (or the complementary measures commission and omission error rates); and (3) use the criterion that an accuracy assessment that reports class-specific accuracies accompanied by standard errors is a strong indicator of a rigorous assessment.
机译:背景景观生态学家经常在他们的研究中使用主题地图数据。更高熟悉主题地图精度评估协议将增强地图质量数据的适当使用和解释。目标概述了主题地图精度评估协议和简单,非定量指南,以评估景观生态学家在其研究中使用的专题地图数据的质量。方法对地图精度评估的合成与解释。结论景观生态学家可以采用三种简单的规则来改善地图数据的使用和解释:(1)仅当准确性评估协议坚持对采样设计,响应设计和分析的严格,既定标准时,才能使用地图质量数据; (2)通过用户和生产者的准确性(或补充措施委员会和遗弃误差率)专注于专用的准确性; (3)使用标准的准确评估,即报告标准误差伴随的类别专用精度是严格评估的强大指标。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号